Chapter 12 · Chemical Kinetics
How concentration sets the speed of a reaction
Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to
§12.1 — What a rate measures
For a balanced reaction aA+bB→cC+dD, the rate is a change in concentration per unit time — divided by the stoichiometric coefficient so every species reports the same number:
rate=−a1ΔtΔ[A]=−b1ΔtΔ[B]=+c1ΔtΔ[C].
Reactants disappear, so Δ[A]<0; the leading minus sign makes the reported rate positive.
The rate at one instant is the slope of the tangent to the concentration–time curve at that moment.
§12.5 — Why reactions have a rate at all
Molecules react only when they collide hard enough — and lined up right. The energy they must muster to reach the transition state is the activation energy Ea.
Only the fraction of collisions carrying at least Ea can cross the barrier. Warming the sample enlarges that fraction — so the rate climbs fast (the Arrhenius picture).
Figure 1: The reacting system must pay Ea to reach the transition state (‡), then falls to a lower-energy product — an exothermic step, ΔE<0.
§12.3 — The differential rate law
The rate depends on concentration through a power law: rate=k[A]m[B]n.
The exponents m and n come from experiment — never from the balanced equation's coefficients.
It sets the reaction's intrinsic speed and depends on temperature — but not on concentration.
The overall order sums the individual orders — and, as we'll see, fixes the units of k.
§12.3 — What the order means
The order in a reactant tells you exactly how the rate responds when you change its concentration:
The rate ignores [A] entirely; doubling the concentration changes nothing.
Rate tracks concentration one-for-one; doubling [A] doubles the rate.
Rate answers steeply; doubling [A] multiplies the rate by 22=4.
§12.3 — Reading order from data
Method 12.3 — Change one concentration at a time
Run several trials, each changing a single reactant's starting concentration, and compare the initial rates. Between two trials that differ only in [A]:
rate1rate2=([A]1[A]2)m.
Solve for the exponent m — that is the order in A. Repeat, holding A fixed and varying B, to get n.
Why it works: holding every other concentration constant isolates one reactant, so the rate ratio depends on that reactant's exponent alone.
§12.3 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.3.1 — For A+B→products
| Trial | [A]0 (M) | [B]0 (M) | Initial rate (M/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 2.0×10−3 |
| 2 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 8.0×10−3 |
| 3 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.6×10−2 |
Solution. Trials 1→2 double [A] at fixed [B] and the rate quadruples: 2m=4, so m=2. Trials 2→3 double [B] at fixed [A] and the rate doubles: 2n=2, so n=1. The rate law is rate=k[A]2[B] — third order overall. From Trial 1, k=(0.10)2(0.10)2.0×10−3=2.0 M−2s−1.
§12.3 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.3.2 — For 2NO+O2→2NO2, use the initial-rate data to find the order in NO, the order in O₂, and the overall order.
| Trial | [NO]0 (M) | [O2]0 (M) | Initial rate (M/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 2.5×10−5 |
| 2 | 0.020 | 0.010 | 1.0×10−4 |
| 3 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 5.0×10−5 |
Answer. Trials 1→2 double [NO] at fixed [O₂] and the rate rises ×4, so 2m=4 gives m=2. Trials 1→3 double [O₂] at fixed [NO] and the rate rises ×2, so 2n=2 gives n=1. The rate law is rate=k[NO]2[O2] — third order overall.
§12.3 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.3.3 — A reaction is first order in A and first order in B, so rate=k[A][B]. In one trial [A]=0.050 M, [B]=0.10 M, and the initial rate is 1.5×10−3 M/s. Find k and its units.
Solution. Solve the rate law for k and substitute:
k=[A][B]rate=(0.050 M)(0.10 M)1.5×10−3 M/s=0.30 M−1s−1.
The units fall out of the algebra — M⋅MM/s=M−1s−1 — exactly what an overall-second-order rate constant must carry.
§12.3 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.3.4 — A reaction is first order in A: rate=k[A]. When [A]=0.15 M the initial rate is 3.0×10−4 M/s. What are k and its units?
Rearrange to k=rate/[A] before you reveal the answer.
Answer. k=0.15 M3.0×10−4 M/s=2.0×10−3 s−1. A first-order rate constant carries units of s−1 — no concentration in them, because the single [A] cancels the M in the rate.
§12.4 — From rate to concentration-in-time
Integrating each differential law gives concentration as a function of time — and, for each order, a different quantity that plots as a straight line in t:
| Order | Integrated law | Linear plot | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zero | [A]=[A]0−kt | [A] vs t | −k |
| First | ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt | ln[A] vs t | −k |
| Second | [A]1=[A]01+kt | 1/[A] vs t | +k |
Table 1: The three integrated rate laws in a single reactant, and the plot that linearises each.
The trick: whichever of [A], ln[A], or 1/[A] plots straight against time tells you the order directly.
§12.4 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.4.1 — A first-order reaction has k=0.025 s−1 and starts at [A]0=0.80 M. What is [A] after t=60 s?
Solution. Use the first-order integrated law ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt:
ln[A]=ln(0.80)−(0.025)(60)=−0.223−1.50=−1.72.
Exponentiate both sides: [A]=e−1.72=0.18 M. The reactant has fallen to about 22% of where it began.
§12.4 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.4.2 — A first-order reaction has k=0.010 s−1 and [A]0=1.00 M. Find [A] after t=120 s, then the fraction of A remaining.
Start from ln[A]=ln[A]0−kt, and note ln(1.00)=0.
Answer. ln[A]=0−(0.010)(120)=−1.20, so [A]=e−1.20=0.30 M. The fraction remaining is e−kt=e−1.20=0.30, i.e. 30%.
§12.4 — The shape of decay
Release the same [A]0 three ways and the concentration falls in three unmistakable shapes.
Zero order falls in a straight line to zero; first order is an exponential with a constant half-life; second order is a hyperbola — steep at first, then a long tail.
Figure 2: Concentration–time decay for the three common orders, all starting from the same [A]0.
§12.4 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.4.3 — A second-order reaction has k=0.50 M−1s−1 and [A]0=0.10 M. Find [A] after t=40 s.
Solution. Use the second-order integrated law [A]1=[A]01+kt:
[A]1=0.101+(0.50)(40)=10+20=30 M−1.
Invert: [A]=1/30=0.033 M. A second-order reaction fades ever more gently as it grows dilute — unlike the constant-percentage decay of first order.
§12.4 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.4.4 — A second-order reaction has k=0.20 M−1s−1 and [A]0=0.50 M. Find [A] after t=25 s.
Reach for [A]1=[A]01+kt and invert at the end.
Answer. [A]1=0.501+(0.20)(25)=2.0+5.0=7.0 M−1, so [A]=1/7.0=0.14 M.
§12.4 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.4.5 — For a decomposition, a plot of 1/[A] against time is a straight line, while plots of [A] and of ln[A] against time both curve. What is the order, and what does the slope of the straight line equal?
Match the variable that plots straight to its integrated rate law.
Answer. A straight 1/[A] vs. t line is the signature of a second-order reaction, [A]1=[A]01+kt; the slope equals the rate constant k (units M−1s−1). For reference: zero order makes [A] linear, first order makes ln[A] linear.
§12.4 — The half-life
The half-life t1/2 is the time for [A] to fall to half its value. For a first-order reaction it is set only by k:
t1/2=kln2.
Because t1/2 contains no [A]0, a first-order reaction takes the same time to halve, again and again — a fingerprint you can spot with no table of k.
Figure 3: Equal-width half-lives each halve [A]: [A]0→[A]0/2→[A]0/4→[A]0/8.
§12.4 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.4.6 — First-order decay with k=0.0693 s−1
Find the half-life, then the time for [A] to fall to one-eighth of its starting value.
Solution. t1/2=kln2=0.06930.693=10 s. Falling to 81 is three successive halvings (21⋅21⋅21=81), and each takes one constant half-life — so the total time is 3t1/2=30 s.
§12.4 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.4.7 — A first-order reaction has k=1.5×10−3 s−1. Find its half-life t1/2, and confirm it does not depend on the starting concentration.
For first order, t1/2=kln2=k0.693.
Answer. t1/2=1.5×10−30.693=462 s (about 7.7 min). Because [A]0 cancels out of the first-order half-life, every successive half-life takes the same 462 s.
§12.4 — Worked example
Worked Example 12.4.8 — A first-order sample has a half-life of t1/2=30 min. What fraction of it remains after 2.0 hours?
Solution. Count how many half-lives fit the elapsed time: 2.0 h=120 min=4t1/2. Each half-life halves the amount, so the fraction remaining is
(21)4=161=0.0625=6.25%.
After four half-lives only about 6% of the original reactant is left.
§12.4 — Try it now
Try It Now 12.4.9 — An isotope decays by first-order kinetics with a half-life of t1/2=8.0 days. What fraction remains after 24 days?
First count how many half-lives fit into 24 days.
Answer. 24 days=3t1/2, so the fraction remaining is (21)3=81=0.125=12.5%.
§12.4 — What the order fixes
| Overall order | Units of k | Half-life t1/2 |
|---|---|---|
| Zero | M s−1 | [A]0/2k |
| First | s−1 | ln2/k (constant) |
| Second | M−1s−1 | 1/(k[A]0) |
Table 2: How the overall order sets the rate-constant units and the half-life's dependence on concentration.
Read it: only the first-order half-life is independent of [A]0 — a constant t1/2 is the signature of first-order decay.
Summary — the whole section on one page
The orders m,n are measured, not read from coefficients; m+n is the overall order and fixes the units of k.
Vary one concentration at a time and take the rate ratio ([A]2/[A]1)m; or see which of [A], ln[A], 1/[A] plots straight in time.
A constant half-life t1/2=ln2/k — and an exponential decay curve — are the fingerprints of a first-order reaction.
A rate law is measured, not derived: find each order from how the rate answers a change in concentration, and the units, half-life, and decay curve all follow.
Next: §12.6 Reaction Mechanisms — how the rate law exposes the slowest elementary step.
Adapted from OpenStax, Chemistry 2e (Chapter 12, Kinetics), published by Rice University under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license; the original is free at openstax.org. Figures 1–3 are dual-theme manim animations drawn for bookSHelf; deck styled in the notebook-tabs visual language (Open Design's fs-notebook-tabs template, MIT).