Chapter 2 · Limits · §2.2
Where a function is headed as x approaches a point — even when you can't, or shouldn't, plug the point in.
02 — Learning objectives
§2.2 — The opening problem
This is the graph of f(x)=x−2x2−4. At x=2 it has no value (you'd divide by zero). So where is the graph headed as x gets close to 2? Make a table — pick x-values just below and just above 2, and compute f(x).
| from the left | f(x) | from the right | f(x) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 1.9 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 4.1 |
| 1.99 | 3.99 | 2.01 | 4.01 |
| 1.999 | 3.999 | 2.001 | 4.001 |
| 1.9999 | 3.9999 | 2.0001 | 4.0001 |
From both sides the values close in on 4 — even though f(2)=00 has no value. The graph heads toward 4 without ever reaching it.
Figure 2.12: f(x)=x−2x2−4 — the line y=x+2 with the point (2,4) punched out.
§2.2 — Name the method · handout
In Closing In you found the single value f(x) was heading toward as x got closer and closer to 2 — without ever using x=2 itself. The point of math is to do it again, for any function. So write down exactly what your group did, step by step — then name and define your method.
Write the steps. Think about:
§2.2 — Name the method · define it
You found where f was heading as x→2 — without ever using x=2. Write down exactly what your group did:
The Closing-In Method — to find the value a function is heading toward as x gets close to a point, plug in x-values closer and closer from both sides and watch what number the outputs settle on.
The question driving this section
You pinned down where one function was headed near one point. Here's the question that drives the rest of the section:
How can we describe where a function is headed near a point — even when we can't, or shouldn't, plug the point in?
The hole at x=2 is only the first way a point can't be trusted. By the end you'll have a name for every way a function can behave as x approaches — and every way that behavior can fail.
§2.2 — The limit, intuitively
Definition 2.2.1 — Limit (Intuitive)
Let f(x) be defined at all values in an open interval containing a, with the possible exception of a itself, and let L be a real number. If all values of f(x) approach L as the values of x (=a) approach a, then the limit of f(x) as x approaches a is L:
x→alimf(x)=L.
Figure: the shaded band — the neighborhood around a — is what the limit reports.
The limit reports what the neighborhood is doing, not the value at the point. For f(x)=x−2x2−4, the value f(2) does not exist — yet x→2limf(x)=4.
§2.2 — Why the hole?
Factor and cancel:
x−2x2−4=x−2(x−2)(x+2)=x+2for x=2.So f is the line y=x+2 with the single point (2,4) punched out. The cancellation is only legal for x=2 — which is why we approach the point instead of substituting it. (Evaluating limits exactly by factoring is the work of §2.3.)
Big Idea. A limit reads where a function is headed, not where it is — like reading which way a friend is heading through a crowd, even when you can't see exactly where they stand.
§2.2 — Estimate a limit from a table
Evaluate x→0limxsinx using a table of values.
The function is even, so the left and right columns match:
| x | sinx/x |
|---|---|
| ±0.1 | 0.99833 |
| ±0.01 | 0.99998 |
| ±0.001 | 0.9999998 |
Both sides march toward 1: x→0limxsinx=1.
Figure 2.13: sinx/x heads to 1 from both sides of 0.
§2.2 — Try it now
Estimate x→1limx−1x1−1 using a table of values.
Simplify first: x−1x1−1=x(x−1)−(x−1)=−x1 for x=1.
Both columns march toward −1: x→1limx−1x1−1=−1. Answer: −1.
| x | f(x) | x | f(x) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9 | -1.1111 | 1.1 | -0.9091 |
| 0.99 | -1.0101 | 1.01 | -0.9901 |
| 0.999 | -1.0010 | 1.001 | -0.9990 |
§2.2 — Estimate a limit from a graph
For the function g(x) shown, evaluate x→−1limg(x).
The marked point shows g(−1)=4, but the curve approaches height 3 from both sides: x→−1limg(x)=3.
The limit and the function value are allowed to disagree — the limit reports the neighborhood, not the isolated point.
Figure 2.15: g(−1)=4 marked, but the curve heads to 3.
§2.2 — From estimates to building blocks
Tables and graphs are quick, but they rest on guesswork — you are reading a trend, not proving a value. The next section builds algebraic limit laws that compute limits exactly.
Before we leave the informal stage, two limits are so basic that every one of those laws will lean on them.
§2.2 — Two atomic limits
Theorem 2.2.1 — Two Important Limits
For any real number a and constant c:
x→alimx=aandx→alimc=c.The identity function f(x)=x marches along with x; a constant function never moves. These two limits are the atomic building blocks inside every limit law we prove from here on.
§2.2 — When a limit misses
For a two-sided limit to exist, f(x) must approach a single real number from both sides. It can miss in two very different ways:
Both get labeled DNE for now — but the rest of the section gives each its own precise vocabulary.
§2.2 — A limit that fails: oscillation
Evaluate x→0limsin(x1).
As x→0, the input 1/x blows up, so sin(1/x) oscillates faster and faster — never settling on a value.
Along x=π2,3π2,5π2,… the value cycles 1,−1,1,−1,… forever. Different paths to 0 give different values, so x→0limsin(x1) DNE.
Figure 2.17: sin(1/x) oscillates without bound as x→0.
§2.2 — When "DNE" hides the real story
Saying "the limit does not exist" sometimes throws away useful information.
sin(1/x) genuinely wandered — nothing more to say. But recall g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣: it settles cleanly on −1 from the left and +1 from the right.
The two-sided limit fails, yet each side is perfectly well-behaved. That deserves its own notation.
Figure: g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣ — clean on each side, jump at x=2.
§2.2 — One-sided limits
Definition 2.2.2 — One-Sided Limits
From the left. If f(x) approaches L as x (x<a) approaches a:
x→a−limf(x)=L.From the right. If f(x) approaches L as x (x>a) approaches a:
x→a+limf(x)=L.For g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣: the two-sided limit DNE, but the side limits are clean — x→2−limg(x)=−1 and x→2+limg(x)=1.
§2.2 — Evaluating one-sided limits
Use the correct branch on each side: x→2−limf(x)=3,x→2+limf(x)=0.
The side limits disagree, so x→2limf(x) DNE — the graph jumps at x=2.
Figure 2.18: the branches disagree — a jump at x=2.
§2.2 — Try it now
Estimate the one-sided limits of x−2∣x2−4∣ at x=2.
Factor: ∣x2−4∣=∣x−2∣∣x+2∣.
x→2−limx−2∣x2−4∣=−4,x→2+limx−2∣x2−4∣=4. Answer: left side −4; right side +4 (two-sided DNE).
§2.2 — One-sided and two-sided
Theorem 2.2.2 — Relating One-Sided and Two-Sided Limits
x→alimf(x)=L⟺x→a−limf(x)=L and x→a+limf(x)=L.The two-sided limit exists exactly when the two side limits shake hands on the same value. If they disagree, the two-sided limit does not exist.
§2.2 — The blow-up failure
Every function so far stayed bounded near its trouble point. But the third opening function never settles:
h(x)=(x−2)21 ⟶ +∞as x→2.This is the blow-up failure we flagged earlier. Rather than write "DNE", we record how it fails — with the symbol ∞.
Figure: h(x)=(x−2)21→+∞ as x→2.
§2.2 — Infinite limits & vertical asymptotes
Definition 2.2.3 — Infinite Limits
If f(x) increases without bound as x→a, we write x→alimf(x)=+∞; if it decreases without bound, x→alimf(x)=−∞. The same applies to the one-sided versions x→a− and x→a+.
Definition 2.2.4 — Vertical Asymptote
The line x=a is a vertical asymptote of f(x) if any one of the following holds:
x→a−limf=±∞, x→a+limf=±∞, x→alimf=±∞.Writing +∞ records how the limit fails — by blowing up — instead of just labeling it "DNE". h(x)=(x−2)21 has x→2limh(x)=+∞, so x=2 is a vertical asymptote. (Infinity describes behavior, not a real-number value.)
§2.2 — Recognizing an infinite limit
Evaluate the one- and two-sided limits of x1 at x=0.
| x | 1/x | x | 1/x |
|---|---|---|---|
| -0.01 | -100 | 0.01 | 100 |
| -0.001 | -1000 | 0.001 | 1000 |
x→0−limx1=−∞,x→0+limx1=+∞. The sides blow up in opposite directions, so x→0limx1 DNE.
Figure 2.19: 1/x blows up to −∞ and +∞ at x=0.
§2.2 — Infinite limits from positive integers
Theorem 2.2.3 — Infinite Limits from Positive Integers
For a real number a and a positive integer n. If n is even:
x→alim(x−a)n1=+∞.If n is odd:
x→a+lim(x−a)n1=+∞,x→a−lim(x−a)n1=−∞.Either way, the line x=a is a vertical asymptote.
§2.2 — Finding a vertical asymptote
Evaluate the limits of f(x)=(x+3)41 at x=−3, and identify any vertical asymptote.
Match the template (x−a)n1: here a=−3 and n=4 (even).
Even n means both sides shoot to +∞:
x→−3−limf(x)=x→−3+limf(x)=x→−3limf(x)=+∞.Because the limit blows up at x=−3, the line x=−3 is a vertical asymptote.
§2.2 — Try it now
Evaluate the limits of f(x)=(x−2)31 at x=2 and identify any vertical asymptote.
n=3 is odd, so the side limits go to opposite infinities:
x→2−lim(x−2)31=−∞,x→2+lim(x−2)31=+∞.The sides disagree, so the two-sided limit DNE. But one side blowing up is enough. Answer: left −∞; right +∞; two-sided DNE; vertical asymptote at x=2.
§2.2 — Four behaviors on one graph
Read each behavior off the graph of f:
Figure 2.21: four distinct behaviors on a single graph.
§2.2 — The question, answered
Where is a function headed near a point — even when the point itself can't be trusted? One graph holds all four answers.
| Point on the graph | Limit verdict |
|---|---|
| smooth (x=−4) | exists; lim=f(a) |
| hole (x=−2) | exists; lim=f(a) |
| jump (x=1) | two-sided DNE; sides clean |
| asymptote (x=3) | infinite; vertical asymptote |
The limit always reads the neighborhood, never the point. When the neighborhood agrees, the limit exists; when it splits or blows up, we don't stop at "DNE" — we name how.
Figure 2.21: one graph, all four verdicts.
§2.2 — Carry forward
We name how.
A limit reads where a function is headed, not where it is — and when it fails, we record whether it wandered or blew up. Next: §2.3 computes limits exactly with the limit laws.
bookSHelf · Calculus Volume 1 · §2.2 · composed in kami · MMXXVI