Calculus · Chapter 2 · Limits
Where is a function headed near a point — even when we can't, or shouldn't, plug the point in?
bookSHelf · Calculus Volume 1 · §2.2 · a self-paced section
Learning objectives — by the end of this section you will be able to
The opening problem — a value the formula can't give you
This is the graph off(x)=x−2x2−4. At x=2 it has no value (you'd divide by zero). So where is the graph headed as x gets close to 2? Pick x-values just below and just above 2, and compute f(x).
Figure 2.2.1: f(x)=x−2x2−4 — the line y=x+2 with the point (2,4) punched out.
| from left | f(x) | from right | f(x) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 1.5 | 3.5 | 2.5 | 4.5 |
| 1.9 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 4.1 |
| 1.99 | 3.99 | 2.01 | 4.01 |
| 1.999 | 3.999 | 2.001 | 4.001 |
| 1.9999 | 3.9999 | 2.0001 | 4.0001 |
Table 2.2.1: outputs from both sides.
Group handout — write down what you did
In Closing In you found the single value f(x) was heading toward as x got closer and closer to 2 — without ever using x=2 itself.
The point of math is to do it again, for any function. Write down exactly what your group did, step by step — then name and define your method.
Write the steps. Think about:
The method, named and defined
You found where f was heading as x→2 — without ever using x=2. Written out, the recipe is:
The Closing-In Method
To find the value a function is heading toward as x gets close to a point, plug in x-values closer and closer from both sides and watch what number the outputs settle on.
The question driving this section
You pinned down where one function was headed near one point. Here is the question that drives the rest of the section:
How can we describe where a function is headed near a point — even when we can't, or shouldn't, plug the point in?
The hole at x=2 is only the first way a point can't be trusted. By the end you'll have a name for every way a function can behave as x approaches — and every way that behavior can fail.
§2.2.1 — the central idea of calculus
Definition 2.2.1 — Intuitive definition of a limit
Let f(x) be defined at all values in an open interval containing a, with the possible exception of a itself, and let L be a real number. If all values of f(x) approach L as the values of x (=a) approach a, then the limit of f(x) as x approaches a is L:
Figure 2.2.2: the limit reports what the neighborhood (the shaded band around a) is doing, not the value at the point.
For f(x)=x−2x2−4, the value f(2) does not exist — yet x→2limf(x)=4.
Why the hole — and the big idea
Factor and cancel:
So f is the line y=x+2 with the single point (2,4) punched out. The cancellation is only legal for x=2 — which is why we approach the point instead of substituting it. (Evaluating limits exactly by factoring is the work of §2.3.)
Big idea
Like reading which way a friend is heading through a crowd, even when you cannot see exactly where they stand — a limit reads where a function is headed, not where it is.
§2.2.2 — estimating a limit from a table
Evaluate x→0limxsinx using a table of values. The function is even, so the left and right columns match.
| x | sinx/x |
|---|---|
| ±0.1 | 0.99833 |
| ±0.01 | 0.99998 |
| ±0.001 | 0.9999998 |
Table 2.2.2: both sides march toward 1.
Figure 2.2.3: y=xsinx near x=0.
Both sides march toward 1: x→0limxsinx=1.
Try it now 2.2.1 — your turn
Simplify first: x−1x1−1=x(x−1)−(x−1)=−x1 for x=1.
| x | f(x) | x | f(x) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.9 | −1.1111 | 1.1 | −0.9091 |
| 0.99 | −1.0101 | 1.01 | −0.9901 |
| 0.999 | −1.0010 | 1.001 | −0.9990 |
Table 2.2.3: both columns march toward −1.
Answer
x→1limx−1x1−1=−1.
§2.2.3 — estimating a limit from a graph
For the function g(x) shown, evaluate x→−1limg(x).
The marked point shows g(−1)=4, but the curve approaches height 3 from both sides:
The limit and the function value are allowed to disagree — the limit reports the neighborhood, not the isolated point.
Figure 2.2.4: curve heads to 3; the marked point sits at 4.
From estimates to building blocks
Tables and graphs are quick, but they rest on guesswork — you are reading a trend, not proving a value. The next section builds algebraic limit laws that compute limits exactly.
Before we leave the informal stage, two limits are so basic that every one of those laws will lean on them.
§2.2.3 — the atomic building blocks
Theorem 2.2.1 — Two basic limits
For any real number a and constant c:
The identity function f(x)=x marches along with x; a constant function never moves. These two limits are the atomic building blocks inside every limit law we prove from here on.
Two ways a limit can fail
For a two-sided limit to exist, f(x) must approach a single real number from both sides. It can miss in two very different ways:
f bounces around forever without settling.
f shoots off toward ±∞, a vertical wall.
Both get labeled DNE for now — but the rest of the section gives each its own precise vocabulary.
§2.2.4 — a limit that fails by oscillation
As x→0, the input 1/x blows up, so sin(1/x) oscillates faster and faster — never settling on a value.
Along x=π2,3π2,5π2,… the value cycles 1,−1,1,−1,… forever. Different paths to 0 give different values, so
Figure 2.2.5: y=sin(1/x) oscillates without bound near 0.
When "DNE" hides the real story
Saying "the limit does not exist" sometimes throws away useful information.
sin(1/x) genuinely wandered — nothing more to say. But recall g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣: it settles cleanly on −1 from the left and +1 from the right.
The two-sided limit fails, yet each side is perfectly well-behaved. That deserves its own notation.
Figure 2.2.6: g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣ — clean on each side, jump at x=2.
§2.2.5 — a name for each side
Definition 2.2.2 — One-sided limits
From the left. If f(x) approaches L as x (x<a) approaches a:
From the right. If f(x) approaches L as x (x>a) approaches a:
For g(x)=x−2∣x−2∣: the two-sided limit DNE, but the side limits are clean — x→2−limg(x)=−1 and x→2+limg(x)=1.
§2.2.5 — one-sided limits of a piecewise function
Use the correct branch on each side:
The side limits disagree, so x→2limf(x) DNE — the graph jumps at x=2.
Figure 2.2.7: the branches meet at different heights — a jump.
Try it now 2.2.4 — your turn
Factor: ∣x2−4∣=∣x−2∣∣x+2∣.
Answer
Left side −4; right side +4; two-sided DNE.
§2.2.5 — the handshake condition
Theorem 2.2.2 — Relating one-sided and two-sided limits
The two-sided limit exists exactly when the two side limits shake hands on the same value. If they disagree, the two-sided limit does not exist.
Back to the blow-up
Every function so far stayed bounded near its trouble point. But the third opening function never settles:
This is the blow-up failure we flagged earlier. Rather than write "DNE", we record how it fails — with the symbol ∞.
Figure 2.2.8: h(x)=(x−2)21 blows up at x=2.
§2.2.6 — naming the blow-up
Definition 2.2.3 — Infinite limits
If f(x) increases without bound as x→a, we write x→alimf(x)=+∞; if it decreases without bound, x→alimf(x)=−∞. The same applies to the one-sided versions x→a− and x→a+. Writing ±∞ records how the limit fails — infinity describes behavior, not a real-number value.
Definition 2.2.4 — Vertical asymptote
The line x=a is a vertical asymptote of f(x) if any one of x→a−limf(x)=±∞, x→a+limf(x)=±∞, or x→alimf(x)=±∞ holds. Example: h(x)=(x−2)21 has x→2limh(x)=+∞, so x=2 is a vertical asymptote.
§2.2.6 — recognizing an infinite limit
| x | 1/x | x | 1/x |
|---|---|---|---|
| −0.01 | −100 | 0.01 | 100 |
| −0.001 | −1000 | 0.001 | 1000 |
Table 2.2.4: the sides run off in opposite directions.
Figure 2.2.9: y=x1 near x=0.
The sides blow up in opposite directions, so x→0limx1 DNE.
§2.2.6 — the even/odd rule
Theorem 2.2.3 — Infinite limits for positive integers n
If n is even:
If n is odd:
Either way, the line x=a is a vertical asymptote.
§2.2.6 — finding a vertical asymptote
Match the template (x−a)n1: here a=−3 and n=4 (even).
Even n means both sides shoot to +∞:
Vertical asymptote
Because the limit blows up at x=−3, the line x=−3 is a vertical asymptote.
Try it now 2.2.6 — your turn
n=3 is odd, so the side limits go to opposite infinities:
The sides disagree, so the two-sided limit DNE. But one side blowing up is enough:
Answer
Left −∞; right +∞; two-sided DNE; vertical asymptote at x=2.
§2.2.6 — four behaviors on one graph
x=−4 (smooth): x→−4limf(x)=0, and f(−4)=0.
x=−2 (hole): x→−2limf(x)=3, but f(−2) is undefined.
x=1 (jump): lim−=6, lim+=3, two-sided DNE, f(1)=6.
x=3 (asymptote): both sides →−∞, f(3) undefined.
Figure 2.2.10: one graph, four kinds of behavior.
§2.2 — conclusions
Where is a function headed near a point — even when the point itself can't be trusted? One graph holds all four answers.
| Point on the graph | Limit verdict |
|---|---|
| smooth (x=−4) | exists; lim=f(a) |
| hole (x=−2) | exists; lim=f(a) |
| jump (x=1) | two-sided DNE; sides clean |
| asymptote (x=3) | infinite; vertical asymptote |
Table 2.2.5: the four verdicts, one per feature.
Figure 2.2.10 (repeated): the four features together.
The limit always reads the neighborhood, never the point. When the neighborhood agrees, the limit exists; when it splits or blows up, we don't stop at "DNE" — we name how. Next: §2.3 The Limit Laws. Back to start.