Integrated Math 1 · Unit 0 · Review of the Essentials
One fact — that aa=1 — generates equivalent fractions, lowest terms, common denominators, and the reciprocal. Everything else is bookkeeping.
bookSHelf · Integrated Math 1 · §0.3 · a self-paced section
Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to
§0.3.1 — Visualizing and simplifying fractions
Cut a pan of cornbread into 8 equal pieces and take 3. You have taken 83 of the pan — the bottom says how many equal pieces the whole was cut into, the top says how many you are talking about.
The word equal is doing real work. Hack the pan into 8 pieces of wildly different sizes and grab 3, and you do not have 83 of anything.
§0.3.1 — Definition
Definition 0.3.1 — Fraction
A fraction is a number written ba, where b=0. The denominator b is the number of equal parts the whole has been divided into; the numerator a is how many of those parts are being counted.
Definition 0.3.1: the denominator names the equal pieces, the numerator counts them.
The denominator can never be zero: 05 asks you to cut a whole into zero equal parts, which describes nothing. Same undefined division as §0.2.
§0.3.1 — The same idea from the other side
| Fraction | As parts of a whole | As a division | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | 3 of 8 equal pieces | 3÷8 | 0.375 |
| 66 | all 6 of 6 equal pieces | 6÷6 | 1 |
| 90 | none of 9 equal pieces | 0÷9 | 0 |
| 411 | 11 quarter-pieces, more than one whole | 11÷4 | 2.75 |
| 07 | 0 equal pieces, which is meaningless | 7÷0 | undefined |
Table 0.3.1: Split 3 pans among 8 people and each gets 3÷8=83 — the picture and the division agree.
The second row generalizes into the engine behind everything that follows: aa=1 for every a=0.
§0.3.1 — Definition
Definition 0.3.2 — Equivalent Fractions Property
If b=0 and c=0, then
ba=b⋅ca⋅cba=b÷ca÷cSlice each of the 8 pieces in half and the 3 you took become 6: 83=166.
Definition 0.3.2: finer pieces, the same amount.
Left to right it builds up to a bigger denominator; right to left it reduces. Both work because multiplying top and bottom by c is multiplying by cc, which is 1.
Insight — slicing does not feed more people
Cutting a pizza into 16 slices instead of 8 does not give you more pizza. It gives you more pieces, each one half as big.
Equivalent fractions are the same amount described with a different piece size.
§0.3.1 — Definition
Definition 0.3.3 — Lowest terms
A fraction is in lowest terms when its numerator and denominator share no common factor other than 1.
Divide top and bottom by their greatest common factor. If it does not jump out, divide by any common factor you see and repeat — you land in the same place.
Definition 0.3.3: the point where no common factor is left to group by.
§0.3.1 — Worked example
Example 0.3.1 — simplify 7042
Both are even, so 2 divides both; both are divisible by 7. Together, 14 divides both and nothing larger does.
7042=70÷1442÷14=533 and 5 share no factor but 1, so this is lowest terms.
| Fraction | GCF | Lowest terms |
|---|---|---|
| 2418 | 6 | 43 |
| 4527 | 9 | 53 |
| 630 | 6 | 5 |
| 2013 | 1 | already lowest |
Table 0.3.2: A GCF of 1 means you are finished; a denominator that divides the numerator gives a whole number.
Context Pause — factors cancel, terms do not
3⋅73⋅5 really is 75, but 3+73+5 is not. In the first the 3 is being multiplied, so it is a factor. In the second it is being added, so it is a term.
Check with numbers: 3+73+5=108=54, nowhere near 75. The two 3s look identical on the page and are doing different jobs.
§0.3.1 — A habit that protects you
| Expression | Can the 4s cancel? | Why | Simplified |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4⋅114⋅9 | yes | 4 is a factor of both | 119 |
| 4+114+9 | no | 4 is a term, not a factor | 1513 |
| 4y4x | yes | 4 multiplies each | yx |
| 44+x | no | the numerator is a sum | 44+x |
Table 0.3.3: Same digits, opposite answers, decided entirely by the operation.
Before cancelling anything, ask whether the numerator and denominator are each a single product. If either carries a + or − at the top level, nothing inside can be cancelled until you factor it — a Chapter 8 skill.
§0.3.1 — Definition
Definition 0.3.4 — Proper and improper fractions
A proper fraction has a numerator smaller than its denominator, so its value is less than 1. An improper fraction has a numerator greater than or equal to its denominator, so its value is 1 or more.
Definition 0.3.4: the one-whole mark is what sorts a proper fraction from an improper one.
§0.3.1 — Definition
Definition 0.3.5 — Mixed number
A mixed number is a whole number written beside a proper fraction, and it means their sum: 243 means 2+43.
Not a recipe to take on faith: since 5=420, the sum 543 is 420+43=423.
Definition 0.3.5: the same pieces gathered into wholes plus a remainder.
† A number beside a fraction means addition; a number beside a variable means multiplication. 243 is a sum, 2x is a product — one more reason algebra prefers 411.
Insight — where the quarters are hiding
Each whole holds 4 quarters, so 5 wholes hold 20 of them.
That is all the "multiply by the denominator" step is doing — counting the quarter-pieces buried inside the whole numbers before adding the 3 loose ones.
§0.3.1 — Worked example
Example 0.3.2 — write 423 as a mixed number, then convert back
Divide the numerator by the denominator: 23÷4=5 remainder 3. Quotient is the whole part, remainder is the new numerator, denominator stays.
423=5435⋅4+3=23| Improper | The division | Mixed |
|---|---|---|
| 517 | 3 r 2 | 352 |
| 831 | 3 r 7 | 387 |
| 99 | 1 r 0 | 1 |
| 640 | simplify to 320, then 6 r 2 | 632 |
Table 0.3.4: Simplify first when you can — the last row.
§0.3.1 — Negative fractions
| Where the sign is | Example | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Out in front | −73 | negative |
| On the numerator | 7−3 | negative |
| On the denominator | −73 | negative |
| On both | −7−3=73 | positive |
Table 0.3.5: The last row is −(−6)=6 wearing fraction clothes.
A fraction is a division, and a division with exactly one negative among its parts comes out negative. Where that sign sits makes no difference to the value.
Context Pause — keep the sign out in front
−32, 3−2 and −32 are the same number, but only the first is easy to keep track of.
A minus sign buried in a denominator gets lost partway through a long problem, and once it is lost you will not find it by rereading. Make moving it to the front automatic.
§0.3.1 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.3.1 — simplify 7254; write 519 as a mixed number; rewrite −136 with the sign in front
18 is the greatest common factor of 54 and 72; 19÷5 is 3 remainder 4; one negative among the parts makes the fraction negative.
§0.3.2 — Multiplying and dividing fractions
Definition 0.3.6 — Fraction multiplication
If b=0 and d=0, then
ba⋅dc=b⋅da⋅cMultiply the numerators, multiply the denominators, then simplify. That is the whole rule.
Definition 0.3.6: two rounds of cutting compound, so both numerators and both denominators multiply.
You have 73 of a pan and want 52 of that. Cutting into 7 strips then each into 5 makes 35 pieces; you keep 6. The word "of" signals multiplication, exactly as §0.1's table promised.
§0.3.2 — A better order to work in
| Multiply first | Simplify first |
|---|---|
| 15⋅2114⋅25=315350 | 14 and 21 share 7, becoming 2 and 3 |
| Divide by 5 to get 6370 | 25 and 15 share 5, becoming 5 and 3 |
| Divide by 7 to get 910 | 32⋅35=910 |
| Biggest number handled: 350 | Biggest number handled: 25 |
Table 0.3.6: Both columns compute 1514⋅2125.
It matters most once the fractions contain variables: a variable factor cancels cleanly, while a variable product has to be expanded and then factored all over again.
§0.3.2 — Worked example
Example 0.3.3 — multiply 1514⋅2125 by simplifying first
Cancel the 7 (14 and 21), then the 5 (25 and 15), then multiply what is left.
† This is still cancelling factors, allowed only because multiplication is the sole operation in sight. The moment a sum appears in a numerator, the same-looking move becomes wrong.
§0.3.2 — Definition
Definition 0.3.7 — Reciprocal
The reciprocal of a nonzero number is the number you multiply it by to get 1. For a fraction, swap numerator and denominator.
85⋅58=4040=1Definition 0.3.7: a reciprocal is the number that turns a product into 1.
A reciprocal keeps the sign of the original, and zero has none — no number times 0 gives 1. That is "you cannot divide by zero" wearing a different hat, and it is why every division rule below carries a nonzero condition.
§0.3.2 — Definition
Definition 0.3.8 — Fraction division
If b, c and d are all nonzero, then
ba÷dc=ba⋅cdOnly the second fraction gets flipped. Flipping both, or flipping the first, throws the answer off badly enough that a rough estimate catches it.
Definition 0.3.8: dividing counts how many fit inside, which is what the reciprocal does.
§0.3.2 — Worked example
Example 0.3.4 — divide 43÷52
The reciprocal of 52 is 25; 3 and 5 share nothing with 4 and 2, so nothing cancels.
43⋅25=815| Division | Rewritten | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 83÷41 | 83⋅14 | 23 |
| −95÷310 | −95⋅103 | −61 |
| 6÷52 | 16⋅25 | 15 |
| 127÷(−127) | 127⋅(−712) | −1 |
Table 0.3.7: Row 3 — dividing by less than 1 grows the answer.
Insight — small pieces fit many times
How many quarters fit inside 3? Twelve, because each whole holds four of them. So 3÷41=12, which is just 3⋅4.
Dividing by something smaller than 1 gives a bigger answer, and multiplying by its reciprocal is the only move that does the same.
§0.3.2 — One you can picture, one you can prove
Write the division as a fraction, then multiply top and bottom by the reciprocal of the divisor — legal, because it is the Equivalent Fractions Property multiplying by a well-chosen form of 1.
ba÷dc=dcba=dc⋅cdba⋅cd=1ba⋅cd=ba⋅cdThe reciprocal is chosen for exactly one reason: it is the multiplier that turns the denominator into 1 so it disappears. Nothing else about it is special — and §0.3.4 uses the same move on complex fractions.
§0.3.2 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.3.2 — multiply 169⋅154, cancelling first; then divide −103÷209
9 and 15 share 3; 4 and 16 share 4.
16⋅159⋅4=4⋅53⋅1=203Multiply by the reciprocal; 3 and 9 share 3, 20 and 10 share 10.
−103⋅920=−32§0.3.3 — Adding and subtracting fractions
Definition 0.3.9 — Fraction addition and subtraction
If c=0, then
ca+cb=ca+bca−cb=ca−bWhen the denominators already match, combine the numerators and leave the denominator alone.
Definition 0.3.9: like denominators add their counts; the denominator names the unit.
The denominator does not change because it is not a quantity you are adding — it is the name of the unit. Two ninths plus five ninths is seven ninths for the same reason 2 feet plus 5 feet is 7 feet and not 7 square feet.
Insight — fractions are like terms in disguise
3x+5x=8x works because both terms count the same kind of thing. 92+95=97 works for exactly the same reason.
§0.1 called those like terms. Unlike denominators are unlike terms — and that is precisely why they have to be renamed before they can combine.
§0.3.3 — Why you never add the denominators
| Sum | Correct | Denominators added — wrong | How you can tell |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41+41 | 21 | 82=41 | a sum cannot equal one of its addends |
| 53+51 | 54 | 104=52 | a sum cannot be less than 53 |
| 21+21 | 1 | 42=21 | two halves make a whole |
Table 0.3.8: Each wrong answer is refuted by size alone, without redoing the arithmetic.
Multiplication does multiply denominators — but it answers a different question. A part of a part really is smaller; addition combines pieces of the same-size whole, and that whole does not change.
§0.3.3 — Definition
Definition 0.3.10 — Least common denominator
The least common denominator (LCD) is the smallest positive number that every denominator in the problem divides into evenly.
Find it by inspection — run through multiples of the larger denominator — or by prime factorization, taking each prime the greatest number of times it appears in any one factorization.
Definition 0.3.10: the first value both ladders of multiples land on.
For 12 and 18: 12=22⋅3, 18=2⋅32, so take two 2s and two 3s — 22⋅32=36.
§0.3.3 — Two patterns worth memorizing
| Denominators | Prime factorizations | LCD | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 and 6 | 22, 2⋅3 | 12 | not 4⋅6=24 |
| 12 and 18 | 22⋅3, 2⋅32 | 36 | |
| 6 and 18 | 2⋅3, 2⋅32 | 18 | one denominator divides the other |
| 5 and 9 | 5, 32 | 45 | no shared factor, so the LCD is the product |
| 10 and 15 | 2⋅5, 3⋅5 | 30 | |
| 14 and 21 | 2⋅7, 3⋅7 | 42 |
Table 0.3.9: No shared factor → the product. One divides the other → the larger.
§0.3.3 — Worked example
Example 0.3.5 — add 125+187
LCD. 12=22⋅3, 18=2⋅32, so LCD=22⋅32=36.
Build both up. 12⋅3=36, so multiply the top by 3; 18⋅2=36, so multiply the top by 2.
3615+3614=362929 is prime and does not divide 36, so this is already lowest terms.
† Whatever you multiply a denominator by, multiply its numerator by too. Multiplying only the bottom changes the number instead of renaming it — and nothing about 365 looks wrong on the page.
§0.3.3 — Worked example
Example 0.3.6 — subtract 107−65
10=2⋅5, 6=2⋅3, so the LCD is 30.
3021−3025=3021−25=30−4=−152The numerator subtraction is ordinary §0.2 integer work, and the sign moves out front at the end.
You are not required to use the least common denominator. Over 60 the same problem gives 6042−6050=−152 — same answer, bigger numbers, one more round of simplifying. The LCD is a convenience, not a law.
§0.3.3 — Check which one the problem is asking for
| Question | Multiplying | Adding |
|---|---|---|
| Do the denominators have to match? | no | yes |
| What happens to the denominators | multiply them | keep the common one |
| What happens to the numerators | multiply them | add them |
| Can you cancel across the two fractions? | yes, before multiplying | no, never |
| Rough size of the answer | smaller than both | bigger than both |
Table 0.3.10: Size rows assume both fractions positive and proper.
The fourth row is the one to watch: cancelling across an addition is the fraction version of cancelling a term, wrong for exactly the reason §0.3.1 gave.
§0.3.3 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.3.3 — add 127+85; then subtract −61−43
12=22⋅3, 8=23 — three 2s and one 3, so the LCD is 24.
2414+2415=2429The LCD of 6 and 4 is 12, and subtracting 9 from −2 moves further negative.
12−2−9=−1211§0.3.4 — Complex fractions and order of operations
Procedure — the fraction bar as a grouping symbol
Simplify the entire numerator. Simplify the entire denominator. Then divide.
Treat each as though wrapped in invisible parentheses. On one line with ÷ you would have to spell them out: (5+3⋅4)÷(23−6). The bar supplies the grouping for free — which is exactly why algebra prefers it.
§0.3.4 — Worked example
Example 0.3.7 — simplify 23−65+3(4)
Numerator by itself — multiplication before addition. Denominator by itself — exponent before subtraction.
8−65+12=21717 and 2 share no factor, so this is lowest terms.
† With signs in it: −2−26−10 has numerator −4 and denominator −4, so the value is −4−4=1 by the like-signs rule from §0.2.
§0.3.4 — Definition
Definition 0.3.11 — Complex fraction
A complex fraction is a fraction whose numerator, denominator, or both are themselves fractions.
109436532+41487Definition 0.3.11: the main bar is the division that happens last.
These look intimidating and are not. The main bar is a division sign, so a complex fraction is a division problem written vertically — and §0.3.2 already told you what to do with one.
§0.3.4 — Worked example
Example 0.3.8 — simplify 10943
Read the main bar as a division, then multiply by the reciprocal and cancel — 3 into 9, and 2 out of 10 and 4.
43÷109=43⋅910=21⋅35=65§0.3.4 — Worked example
Example 0.3.9 — simplify 6532+41
Numerator first — LCD of 3 and 4 is 12.
128+123=1211Now multiply by the reciprocal and cancel the 6 into the 12.
1211⋅56=1011| Complex fraction | Rewritten | Simplified |
|---|---|---|
| 487 | 87⋅41 | 327 |
| 536 | 6⋅35 | 10 |
| 34−92 | −92⋅43 | −61 |
Table 0.3.11: Row 2 — dividing 6 by less than 1 gives more than 6. If your answer shrank, you flipped the wrong fraction.
§0.3.4 — Worked example
Example 0.3.10 — simplify 43+21(52)2
Exponent first — it applies to numerator and denominator both. Then multiplication, cancelling the 2 into the 4. Then addition over the LCD 100.
(52)2=254→21⋅254=252→10075+8=10083† (52)2 and 522 are different numbers — the §0.1 placement warning, in fraction form.
§0.3.4 — Worked example
Example 0.3.11 — evaluate x+52x when x=−21
Numerator: unlike signs give −1. Denominator: write 5 as 210 so it matches. The result is a complex fraction, so multiply by the reciprocal.
† Those parentheses are not decoration: without them, 2x at x=−21 invites the reading 2−21, and the whole problem goes wrong on the first line.
Context Pause — a zero denominator has no value
x+52x means nothing when x=−5, because the denominator becomes zero.
Such a value is not merely awkward to work with — it is not in the expression's domain at all, so the expression has no value there. Finding that restriction is the first move in almost every Chapter 3 problem.
§0.3.4 — Fractions in a real setting
Materials cost $48; the crew finished 85 of the hallway. Cancel the 8 into the 48 first.
85⋅48=5⋅6=30$30 covered 85 of it — what does the whole job cost?
30÷85=30⋅58=48† The built-in check: 85+83=88=1, so the remaining 83 accounts for the other $18. Deciding which setup a situation calls for is the real skill — §0.5 gives you the properties to rearrange relationships on purpose.
§0.3.4 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.3.4 — simplify 8543+21; then evaluate x+34x at x=−21
Numerator first: 43+42=45. Then the main bar is a division.
45⋅58=2Numerator 4⋅(−21)=−2; denominator −21+26=25.
25−2=−2⋅52=−54Key Terminology — the eleven words this section defines
fraction — ba with b=0, naming a of b equal parts.
numerator — the top number, counting the parts taken.
denominator — the bottom number, naming the equal parts.
equivalent fractions — two fractions naming the same amount.
lowest terms — no common factor but 1.
proper fraction — numerator smaller than denominator.
improper fraction — numerator greater than or equal to denominator.
mixed number — a whole number beside a proper fraction, meaning their sum.
reciprocal — what you multiply by to get 1; swap top and bottom.
least common denominator — the smallest number every denominator divides evenly.
complex fraction — a fraction whose parts are themselves fractions.
The headline result
Every procedure here is multiplying by a form of 1
aa=1 builds equivalent fractions, reduces to lowest terms, raises two fractions to a common denominator, and — as c/dc/d — is what makes "flip and multiply" a proof rather than a trick.
Multiplying by 1 cannot change what a number is worth, only how it is written. That is why all of it is legal.
† It also explains the one rule that is not optional: you may only cancel factors. Cancelling a term is not multiplying by a form of 1, so nothing licenses it.
§0.3 — Conclusions
A fraction is both a part of a whole and a division, and renaming it by a form of 1 changes its appearance without changing its value. Multiplication and division need no common denominator; addition and subtraction need one, because unlike denominators are unlike terms.
Cancelling a term instead of a factor, adding the denominators, multiplying only the bottom when building up to an LCD, flipping the wrong fraction in a division, and losing a minus sign parked in a denominator.
Next: §0.4 Decimals — the same numbers written a different way, plus roots and the real number line. Back to start.