Integrated Math 1 · Unit 0 · Review of the Essentials

Decimals

The place-value pattern from §0.1 run the other way — then fractions, percents, square roots, and the number line filled in completely.


bookSHelf  ·  Integrated Math 1  ·  §0.4  ·  a self-paced section

The longest section in the unit — it ends by naming every kind of number the course uses.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to

Objectives

  1. Read, write, compare and round decimals using place value Def 0.4.1
  2. Round money amounts to the nearest cent Ex 0.4.2
  3. Add, subtract, multiply and divide decimals, and say why each rule works §0.4.2
  4. Convert among decimals, fractions and percents Def 0.4.3–0.4.5
  5. Simplify square roots and recognize when one is not real Def 0.4.6–0.4.8
  6. Classify a number: counting, whole, integer, rational, irrational, real Def 0.4.9–0.4.11
The six section SLOs verbatim.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Decimal notation and rounding

Decimal point

Definition 0.4.1 — Decimal point

The decimal point separates the whole-number places from the fractional places. Every place to its right is worth one tenth of the place immediately before it.

§0.1's places ran ones, tens, hundreds — each ten times the one to its right. Nothing stops the pattern running the other way.

Place values mirror around the ones place, and the decimal point marks where the whole-number part ends The number 36.407 is seated in a horizontal place-value strip. The ones digit 6 is highlighted as the pivot the pattern reflects around. To its left the tens digit 3 sits one place over, worth ten times as much, with an arrow marked times ten. A vertical rule marks the decimal point exactly where the whole-number part ends. To the right, an arrow marked divide by ten leads into the tenths digit 4, the hundredths digit 0, and the thousandths digit 7, each place worth one tenth of the place before it; a ten-thousandths place is shown with a dash instead of a digit, since 36.407 does not reach that place. The expansion 36.407 = 3(10) + 6(1) + 4(1/10) + 0(1/100) + 7(1/1,000) appears below. Two closing notes record that there is no "oneths" place, because tenths sits opposite tens across the ones pivot rather than opposite ones, and that the 0 in the hundredths place is a placeholder: delete it and 36.407 becomes the different number 36.47. Ones 6 1 Tens 3 10 ×10 whole-number part ends here Tenths 4 0.1 Hundredths 0 0.01 Thousandths 7 0.001 Ten-thousandths 0.0001 ÷10 36.407 = 3(10) + 6(1) + 4(1/10) + 0(1/100) + 7(1/1,000) there is no "oneths" place — tenths sits opposite tens because ones is the pivot the 0 in hundredths is a placeholder — delete it and 36.407 becomes 36.47

Definition 0.4.1: the places mirror around the ones place, and the point marks where the whole-number part ends.

Moving right divides by ten each time.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Two letters, four orders of magnitude

The places on both sides

PlacePositionAs a fractionAs a decimal
Tens2 left10101010
Ones1 left1111
Tenths1 right110\dfrac{1}{10}0.10.1
Hundredths2 right1100\dfrac{1}{100}0.010.01
Thousandths3 right11,000\dfrac{1}{1{,}000}0.0010.001
Ten-thousandths4 right110,000\dfrac{1}{10{,}000}0.00010.0001

Table 0.4.1: There is no "oneths" place — ones is the pivot the pattern reflects around.

The "-th" ending does real work. Ten thousand is large; one ten-thousandth is tiny. Two letters are the entire difference between 10,00010{,}000 and 0.00010.0001.

36.407=3(10)+6(1)+4 ⁣(110)+7 ⁣(11,000)36.407 = 3(10) + 6(1) + 4\!\left(\tfrac{1}{10}\right) + 7\!\left(\tfrac{1}{1{,}000}\right)

The hundredths zero is a placeholder. Delete it and 36.40736.407 collapses to 36.4736.47 — a different number.

Same placeholder job the zero in 4,072 did in §0.1.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Reading decimals aloud

A four-step routine

Procedure — naming a decimal

1. Name the whole-number part.

2. Say "and" for the decimal point.

3. Name the digits right of the point as if they were a whole number.

4. Name the place of the last digit.

DecimalRead as
0.0620.062sixty-two thousandths
7.47.4seven and four tenths
7.047.04seven and four hundredths
12.38512.385twelve and three hundred eighty-five thousandths
0.00090.0009nine ten-thousandths

Table 0.4.2: 7.47.4 and 7.047.04 differ by one zero — and that zero costs the 4 a factor of ten.

36.40736.407 is "thirty-six and four hundred seven thousandths."
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Context Pause — why "and" is off limits inside a whole number

The word is reserved

§0.1 said 204 is "two hundred four," never "two hundred and four." Now you can see why.

"And" is reserved for the decimal point, so "two hundred and four" would be indistinguishable from 200.4200.4 when spoken aloud.

A §0.1 convention that only makes sense once decimals arrive.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Worked example

From words to digits and back

Example 0.4.1 — write "nine and forty-six thousandths" in standard form; then read 0.2070.207 aloud


The phrase names thousandths, so the last digit goes three places right of the point. The digits are 46 — the 6 takes thousandths, the 4 takes hundredths, and tenths needs a placeholder zero.

9.0469.046

0.2070.207 has no whole part; the last digit sits in thousandths — "two hundred seven thousandths."

† "Five and eighty-one thousandths" is 5.0815.081, not 5.815.81. Writing the second multiplies the fractional part by ten.

The named place tells you where the last digit lands; fill gaps with zeros.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Insight — dollars before dimes

Compare the big places first

Think of tenths as dimes and hundredths as pennies. Someone with 7 dimes has more than someone with 6 dimes and 8 pennies, no matter how many coins each is holding.

You compare the big places first and only look at the small ones to break a tie. So 0.7>0.680.7 > 0.68, even though 0.680.68 has more digits.

"More digits means bigger" is true for whole numbers and false here — the most stubborn misconception in the section.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Comparing decimals

Pad, then compare place by place

ComparisonPadded to matchFirst place they differResult
0.70.7 and 0.680.680.700.70 and 0.680.68tenths: 7 beats 60.7>0.680.7 > 0.68
0.3250.325 and 0.330.330.3250.325 and 0.3300.330hundredths: 2 loses to 30.325<0.330.325 < 0.33
4.94.9 and 4.904.904.904.90 and 4.904.90they never differ4.9=4.904.9 = 4.90
0.080.08 and 0.10.10.080.08 and 0.100.10tenths: 0 loses to 10.08<0.10.08 < 0.1
0.4-0.4 and 0.35-0.350.40-0.40 and 0.35-0.35negatives flip the order0.4<0.35-0.4 < -0.35

Table 0.4.3: Padding is safe — 0.7=0.70=0.7000.7 = 0.70 = 0.700, since 710=70100\tfrac{7}{10} = \tfrac{70}{100}.

The §0.2 rule still runs everything: a number is greater than whatever sits to its left, no matter how many decimal places it carries.

Stop at the first place where the digits differ.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Rounding a decimal

Same four steps, one change at the end

Procedure — rounding a decimal

1. Find the digit in the place you are rounding to.

2. Look at the digit immediately to its right.

3. If it is 5 or more, add 1. Otherwise leave it alone.

4. Drop every digit to the right — do not replace them with zeros.

Round 8.47638.4763 toDigit right of itResult
Tenths7 — round up8.58.5
Hundredths6 — round up8.488.48
Thousandths3 — leave it8.4768.476
Whole number4 — leave it88

Table 0.4.4: Four places, four different answers — every one from the original.

† Step 4 is the change. Rounding 6,473 to hundreds needed the zeros in 6,500, because those places carry value. Right of the point a trailing zero carries none.

Start over from the original number every time — the §0.1 chained-rounding warning again.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Context Pause — rollover carries just like addition

When the rounding digit is 9

It becomes 10 and carries into the next place. Rounding 2.3972.397 to hundredths turns the 9 into 10, which carries into the tenths, giving 2.402.40.

That trailing zero stays, because here it reports how precise the answer is — the one case where a trailing zero earns its place.

Same rollover as 3,962 → 4,000 in §0.1.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Rounding money

Round to the nearest cent, once, at the end

Exact amountTo the nearest centWhy
$47.3826\$47.3826$47.38\$47.38thousandths digit is 2, so leave the 8 alone
$47.3852\$47.3852$47.39\$47.39thousandths digit is 5, so the 8 becomes 9
$9.995\$9.995$10.00\$10.00the nines roll over and carry into the dollars
$0.4499\$0.4499$0.45\$0.45thousandths digit is 9, so the 4 becomes 5

Table 0.4.5: Tax, per-unit prices, interest and gasoline all compute to more than two places before anyone rounds.

Carry the exact value all the way through and round only at the very end. Rounding partway is the same chained-rounding mistake — and on a long receipt those errors add into a total that visibly disagrees with the register.

The nearest cent is the hundredths place — a fixed convention, not a choice.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Worked example

Rounding a tax calculation

Example 0.4.2 — a jacket costs $18.95\$18.95; tax at 7.25%7.25\% is exactly $1.373875\$1.373875


In $1.373875\$1.373875 the hundredths digit is 7 and the digit to its right is 3. Since 3 is less than 5, the 7 stays and the rest is dropped.

$1.373875$1.37\$1.373875 \rightarrow \$1.37

Line up the decimal points and add.

$18.95+$1.37=$20.32\$18.95 + \$1.37 = \$20.32

The tax was rounded once, at the end of the tax computation — which is what a register does.

$1.37 in tax, $20.32 total.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.1 — Your turn

Try It Now 0.4.1

Try It Now 0.4.1 — write "six and ninety-four hundredths"; decide which is larger, 0.4090.409 or 0.410.41; round 0.4090.409 to the nearest hundredth


94 fills tenths and hundredths exactly — no placeholder needed.

6.940.409  vs  0.410    0.409<0.410.4090.416.94 \qquad 0.409 \;\text{vs}\; 0.410 \;\Rightarrow\; 0.409 < 0.41 \qquad 0.409 \rightarrow 0.41

Tenths match at 4; hundredths are 0 against 1. Then rounding: the hundredths digit is 0 and 9 follows it, so the 0 becomes 1.

Note the comparison and the rounding give the same two digits for different reasons.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Operations with decimals

Trailing zero

Definition 0.4.2 — Trailing zero

A trailing zero sits at the right end of the fractional part. It never changes the value, so you may add or remove them freely to make places line up.

12.403.75+  0.6016.75\begin{array}{r} 12.40 \\ 3.75 \\ +\;0.60 \\ \hline 16.75 \end{array}
Appending trailing zeros re-slices the same shaded amount into finer pieces without moving its edge On the left, a bar shaded to seven tenths of its length is divided first into ten equal parts with seven shaded, then finely into a hundred parts with seventy shaded, then a thousand parts too fine to draw individually with seven hundred shaded -- the shaded edge never moves, building the equalities zero point seven equals zero point seven zero equals zero point seven zero zero, and seven tenths equals seventy hundredths equals seven hundred over one thousand. On the right, the addition twelve point four plus three point seven five plus zero point six is padded with trailing zeros so every addend has two decimal places, the decimal points line up on one vertical guide, the appended zeros are marked in accent, and the column sum reads sixteen point seven five. A closing note records that a whole number carries an invisible decimal point at its right end, so forty is forty point zero zero, which is how the section subtracts six point two eight from forty to get thirty-three point seven two. 0.7 7/10 = 0.70 = 70/100 = 0.700 = 700/1,000 1 2 . 4 0 3 . 7 5 + 0 . 6 0 1 6 . 7 5 A whole number carries an invisible decimal point at its right end, so 40 is 40.00. That is how the section subtracts 6.28 from 40 to get 33.72.

Definition 0.4.2: appending zeros re-slices the same amount into finer pieces without moving its edge.

You can only add quantities of the same kind. Tenths add to tenths — never straight to hundredths, any more than 3 hours add to 8 minutes. Line up the points, not the edges.

Right-aligning 12.412.4 and 3.753.75 stacks 4 over 5 — tenths onto hundredths, and nonsense. 406.2840 - 6.28 works because 40 is 40.00.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Multiplying: count the decimal places

A statement about exponents in disguise

ProductIgnoring the pointsPlacesAnswer
2.4×3.52.4 \times 3.524×35=84024 \times 35 = 8401+11 + 18.48.4
0.7×0.030.7 \times 0.037×3=217 \times 3 = 211+21 + 20.0210.021
1.6×0.451.6 \times 0.4516×45=72016 \times 45 = 7201+21 + 20.720.72
0.5×0.50.5 \times 0.55×5=255 \times 5 = 251+11 + 10.250.25
12×0.0812 \times 0.0812×8=9612 \times 8 = 960+20 + 20.960.96

Table 0.4.6: Places in the product = places in the first factor + places in the second.

0.7×0.03=710×3100=211,0000.7 \times 0.03 = \frac{7}{10} \times \frac{3}{100} = \frac{21}{1{,}000}

One place plus two places gives three because 101102=10310^1 \cdot 10^2 = 10^3. The zeros in the denominator are the decimal places.

† Row 4: 0.5×0.5=0.250.5 \times 0.5 = 0.25 is smaller than either factor. Multiplying by a number between 0 and 1 shrinks things — an instinct built on whole numbers has to go before Chapter 2.

It is §0.3 fraction multiplication wearing a disguise.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Worked example

Placing the point in a product

Example 0.4.3 — compute 0.24×3.50.24 \times 3.5


Drop the points: 24×35=84024 \times 35 = 840. Two places in 0.240.24 and one in 3.53.5 means 2+1=32 + 1 = 3 places, so count three left from the right end of 840.

0.840=0.840.840 = 0.84

Sanity check: 0.240.24 is about a quarter, and a quarter of 3.5 is a little less than 1 — so 0.84 is believable.

The estimate is the habit worth teaching, not the digits.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Dividing by a decimal

Move both points

ProblemShift both byRewrittenAnswer
8.61÷0.38.61 \div 0.31 place86.1÷386.1 \div 328.728.7
0.144÷0.060.144 \div 0.062 places14.4÷614.4 \div 62.42.4
7÷0.257 \div 0.252 places700÷25700 \div 252828
5.5÷1.15.5 \div 1.11 place55÷1155 \div 1155

Table 0.4.7: Moving only the divisor's point changes the answer by a factor of ten.

8.610.3=8.61×100.3×10=86.13\frac{8.61}{0.3} = \frac{8.61 \times 10}{0.3 \times 10} = \frac{86.1}{3}

Multiplying both parts by the same thing leaves the value unchanged — the equivalent-fractions idea from §0.3.

Row 3 is the other instinct to retrain: dividing by a number between 0 and 1 makes things bigger.

"How many quarter-units fit inside 7?" has a large answer. Dividing by a whole number just needs the point brought straight up.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Multiplying and dividing by powers of ten

Count the zeros, slide the point

OperationPoint movesExample
×10\times 101 place right4.62×10=46.24.62 \times 10 = 46.2
×100\times 1002 places right4.62×100=4624.62 \times 100 = 462
×1,000\times 1{,}0003 places right4.62×1,000=4,6204.62 \times 1{,}000 = 4{,}620
÷10\div 101 place left4.62÷10=0.4624.62 \div 10 = 0.462
÷100\div 1002 places left4.62÷100=0.04624.62 \div 100 = 0.0462
÷1,000\div 1{,}0003 places left4.62÷1,000=0.004624.62 \div 1{,}000 = 0.00462

Table 0.4.8: Append placeholder zeros whenever the digits run out — row 3 needs one in the ones place.

This shortcut is behind every metric-unit conversion you will ever do, and §1.3 comes back to it as a statement about exponents.

Multiplying by 10 bumps every digit up one place — same thing as sliding the point.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Worked example

Order of operations with decimals

Example 0.4.4 — simplify   0.6(4.51.25)+0.8\;0.6(4.5 - 1.25) + 0.8


Grouping first — pad 4.54.5 to 4.504.50 so the places line up. Then multiply: 6×325=19506 \times 325 = 1950, needing 1+2=31 + 2 = 3 places. Then add, padding 0.80.8 to 0.800.80.

3.25    1.95    1.95+0.80=2.753.25 \;\rightarrow\; 1.95 \;\rightarrow\; 1.95 + 0.80 = 2.75

† Nothing about the §0.1 order changes. Almost everyone gets the digits right; what separates a correct answer from a wrong one is whether the point in the product landed in the right spot. Count the places before you write the product down.

Answer 2.75. The point is where the errors hide.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.2 — Your turn

Try It Now 0.4.2

Try It Now 0.4.2 — compute 0.9×0.040.9 \times 0.04; then 6.3÷0.76.3 \div 0.7; then simplify   2.5+0.4(61.5)\;2.5 + 0.4(6 - 1.5)


9×4=36,  1+2=3 places    0.0369 \times 4 = 36,\; 1 + 2 = 3 \text{ places} \;\Rightarrow\; 0.036 6.30.7=637=92.5+0.4(4.5)=2.5+1.8=4.3\frac{6.3}{0.7} = \frac{63}{7} = 9 \qquad 2.5 + 0.4(4.5) = 2.5 + 1.8 = 4.3

Part 1 needs a placeholder zero in the tenths spot.

Answers 0.036, 9, 4.3.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Decimals, fractions, and percents

Three notations for the same quantities

Each is convenient somewhere

Fractions are exact and are what algebra prefers. Decimals are easiest to compare and are what a calculator hands you. Percents are the clearest way to report a proportion to another person.

Decimal → fraction: read it aloud

The name is the fraction. 0.360.36 is "thirty-six hundredths," so 36100=925\tfrac{36}{100} = \tfrac{9}{25}. The denominator is always the place value of the last digit.

Being fluent means converting without stopping to think, because a problem almost never arrives in the notation you want to work in.

Fraction → decimal is just division: 38=3÷8=0.375\tfrac{3}{8} = 3 \div 8 = 0.375.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Definition

Terminating decimal

Definition 0.4.3 — Terminating decimal

A terminating decimal is a decimal whose digits stop. The division reaches a remainder of zero.

A terminating decimal is a decimal whose digits stop A long division of three divided by eight builds the decimal zero point three seven five, one digit at a time. Thirty divided by eight gives quotient digit three with remainder six. Sixty divided by eight gives quotient digit seven with remainder four. Forty divided by eight gives quotient digit five with remainder zero, and reaching a remainder of zero is what makes the digits stop. The figure closes with the equality three eighths equals zero point three seven five, and a note that eight factors as two times two times two, only twos and fives, which is why the decimal terminates. 8 3.000 0 . 3 30 ÷ 8 → 3, r 6 7 60 ÷ 8 → 7, r 4 5 40 ÷ 8 → 5, r 0 3 8 = 0.375 the digits stop 8 = 2 · 2 · 2 — only 2s and 5s, so it terminates

Definition 0.4.3: it stops because the division reaches a remainder of zero.

Every fraction converts, but the division can end in one of two ways.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Definition

Repeating decimal

Definition 0.4.4 — Repeating decimal

A repeating decimal is one in which a block of digits repeats forever. The division never reaches remainder zero; a remainder comes back around, and the quotient digits cycle.

The bar is not decoration — it states that the block goes on without end, which 0.83330.8333\ldots only hints at.

A repeating decimal is a decimal whose quotient digits cycle forever A long division bracket divides five by six. Six goes outside the bracket, five and two trailing zeros sit inside it, and a quotient builds above: zero point. Dividing fifty by six gives the quotient digit eight with remainder two, recorded at the side as fifty divided by six equals eight remainder two, the remainder in rust. Dividing twenty by six gives the quotient digit three with remainder two again, recorded as twenty divided by six equals three remainder two, and this second remainder two is circled because it matches the first one exactly. A curved arrow loops from the second remainder back to the first, labelled same remainder, showing that from here the division only repeats itself. A bar lands over the quotient's three, and below, the equation zero point eight with a bar over the three equals zero point eight three three three continuing states what the bar means. A smaller, grey aside compares four divided by eleven, which equals zero point, bar over three six, equals zero point three six three six continuing, noting that the bar there covers both digits, so the pair repeats as a block instead of just the one digit. 6 5 . 0 0 0 . 8 50 ÷ 6 = 8 R 2 3 20 ÷ 6 = 3 R 2 same remainder 3 0.8 3 = 0.8333… compare: 4 ÷ 11 = 0. 3 6 = 0.363636… the bar covers both digits, so the pair repeats as a block

Definition 0.4.4: a remainder that comes back around is what makes the digits cycle forever.

Watch where each bar starts. In 0.830.8\overline{3} only the 3 repeats, so it is 0.83330.8333\ldots. In 0.360.\overline{36} the pair repeats as a block: 0.3636360.363636\ldots.

56=0.83\tfrac{5}{6} = 0.8\overline{3}, 411=0.36\tfrac{4}{11} = 0.\overline{36}, 23=0.6\tfrac{2}{3} = 0.\overline{6}.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Predicting which fractions terminate

Only 2s and 5s terminate

FractionDenominator factoredOnly 2s and 5s?PredictionActual
38\dfrac{3}{8}2222 \cdot 2 \cdot 2yesterminates0.3750.375
720\dfrac{7}{20}2252 \cdot 2 \cdot 5yesterminates0.350.35
56\dfrac{5}{6}232 \cdot 3no, there is a 3repeats0.830.8\overline{3}
411\dfrac{4}{11}1111no, there is an 11repeats0.360.\overline{36}

Table 0.4.9: 2 and 5 are the two primes that divide 10 — any other prime factor forces a repeat.

Reduce first — not optional. 615\tfrac{6}{15} has a 3 in the denominator and predicts a repeat, but in lowest terms it is 25=0.4\tfrac{2}{5} = 0.4, which terminates. Test the fraction in lowest terms, not whatever form you were handed.

You can tell which ending you get before you divide.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Definition

Percent

Definition 0.4.5 — Percent

A percent is a fraction whose denominator is 100, written with %\% in place of the denominator.

So 42%=42100=0.4242\% = \dfrac{42}{100} = 0.42. Percent → decimal: drop the %\%, move the point two places left. Decimal → percent: move it two right, attach the %\%.

A percent is a fraction whose denominator is 100, with the percent sign in place of the denominator A ten by ten grid of one hundred small squares fills row by row until forty-two are shaded rust. Beside the grid, the fraction 42 over 100 appears, then the decimal 0.42, then the percent sign lands in the exact spot the denominator 100 occupied, which dims to a faint trace, and a confirming “equals 42 percent” label appears. A footer note reads “per hundred, always” beside two equalities from the section's percent table: 125% equals 1.25, more than the whole, and 0.8% equals 0.008, not 0.8. 42 of 100 squares shaded 42 100 = 0.42 % = 42% per hundred, always 125% = 1.25 — more than the whole 0.8% = 0.008, not 0.8

Definition 0.4.5: the percent sign stands in for a denominator of 100.

Both conversions are mechanical because dividing by 100 moves the point two places.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Insight — a percent is a score out of 100

Rewriting so they line up

If you got 17 out of 20 on a quiz, nobody compares that to 43 out of 50 in their head.

Rewriting both as scores out of 100 makes them line up instantly — and that rewriting is all a percent is.

A common denominator, chosen once, for everybody.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — A percent need not land between 0 and 100

Read the symbol as "per hundred"

PercentDecimalFraction in lowest terms
75%75\%0.750.7534\dfrac{3}{4}
8%8\%0.080.08225\dfrac{2}{25}
125%125\%1.251.2554\dfrac{5}{4}
0.8%0.8\%0.0080.0081125\dfrac{1}{125}
250%250\%2.52.552\dfrac{5}{2}

Table 0.4.10: Rows 3 and 4 contradict a widespread belief.

125%125\% is a perfectly good number — it is 1.251.25, more than the whole — and it turns up any time something grows past its original size.

0.8%0.8\% is less than one percent. Writing it as 0.80.8 is an error by a factor of one hundred: 0.8100=0.008\dfrac{0.8}{100} = 0.008.

Read "per hundred" every time and both rows lose their drama.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Worth recognizing on sight

Common equivalents

FractionDecimalPercent
12\dfrac{1}{2}0.50.550%50\%
13\dfrac{1}{3}0.30.\overline{3}3313%33\tfrac{1}{3}\%
23\dfrac{2}{3}0.60.\overline{6}6623%66\tfrac{2}{3}\%
14\dfrac{1}{4}0.250.2525%25\%
34\dfrac{3}{4}0.750.7575%75\%
15\dfrac{1}{5}0.20.220%20\%
FractionDecimalPercent
25\dfrac{2}{5}0.40.440%40\%
18\dfrac{1}{8}0.1250.12512.5%12.5\%
38\dfrac{3}{8}0.3750.37537.5%37.5\%
110\dfrac{1}{10}0.10.110%10\%
1100\dfrac{1}{100}0.010.011%1\%
111.01.0100%100\%

Table 0.4.11: The 13\tfrac{1}{3} row is why you see 3313%33\tfrac{1}{3}\% rather than 33.3%33.3\% — the decimal repeats forever, so a decimal percent is rounded while the fraction is exact.

Split into two columns so nothing shrinks below readable size. The same handful of equivalents reappears throughout Chapter 4's data work; when exactness matters, keep the fraction.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Worked example

All the way around the triangle

Example 0.4.5 — convert 38\dfrac{3}{8} to a decimal then a percent; convert 24%24\% to a decimal then a fraction


38=3÷8=0.375    37.5%\frac{3}{8} = 3 \div 8 = 0.375 \;\rightarrow\; 37.5\% 24%    0.24    24100=62524\% \;\rightarrow\; 0.24 \;\rightarrow\; \frac{24}{100} = \frac{6}{25}

The bar means division; moving the point two places converts either way; the denominator is the place value of the last digit.

Both 24 and 100 are divisible by 4, reducing in one step.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.3 — Your turn

Try It Now 0.4.3

Try It Now 0.4.3 — convert 0.450.45 to a fraction and a percent; then decide which is largest: 58\dfrac{5}{8}, 0.630.63, or 61%61\%


0.45=45100=920=45%0.45 = \frac{45}{100} = \frac{9}{20} = 45\%

Put all three in one notation — decimals rank by place value with no common denominator to hunt for.

58=0.6250.63=0.63061%=0.610\frac{5}{8} = 0.625 \qquad 0.63 = 0.630 \qquad 61\% = 0.610

All three have 6 tenths; hundredths are 2, 3 and 1, so 0.630.63 is largest.

Converting to one notation before comparing is the transferable move.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Square roots and the real numbers

Square root and the radical sign

Definition 0.4.6 — Square root and the radical sign

A square root of mm is a number whose square is mm, written m\sqrt{m}; the symbol     \sqrt{\;\;} is the radical sign.

81=9because92=81\sqrt{81} = 9 \quad \text{because} \quad 9^2 = 81
Squaring asks what 9 rows of 9 come to; the square root asks the reverse A 9 by 9 grid of unit cells sits on the left, its side labelled 9 and its total area labelled 81, alongside the equation 9 squared equals 81. A curved arrow then runs back from the area to the side, carrying the label radical 81, and lands on the 9, which turns rust to mark it as the answer. On the right, a hand-drawn radical sign — a tick and a horizontal bar — spans exactly over 25 minus 9, showing that the radical groups everything underneath it before the root is taken: radical of 25 minus 9 equals radical 16 equals 4. A grey aside beneath it contrasts radical 25 minus radical 9, which equals 5 minus 3, equals 2 — a different, wrong answer, proving the grouping is not optional. The figure closes on radical 81 equals 9, because 9 squared equals 81. 9 9 81 9² = 81 √81 9 the radical groups everything under the bar 25 − 9 = √16 = 4 √25 − √9 = 5 − 3 = 2 different answers — grouping is not optional √81 = 9 because 9² = 81

Definition 0.4.6: squaring asks what 9 rows of 9 come to; the square root asks the reverse.

A subtlety hides in that line: both 9 and 9-9 square to 81. If 81\sqrt{81} meant "either one" it would not name a single number, and every expression containing it would be ambiguous.

Like signs multiply to a positive — §0.2 — which is what creates the ambiguity.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Definition

Principal square root

Definition 0.4.7 — Principal square root

The principal square root of a nonnegative number is its nonnegative square root. m\sqrt{m} always means the principal root, so 81=9\sqrt{81} = 9 and never 9-9.

To ask for the negative root, put the sign outside: 81=9-\sqrt{81} = -9. The radical groups — finish everything underneath, then apply the outside sign.

Two numbers square to 81, so the radical sign is defined to hand back only the nonnegative one A number line carries negative 9 and 9. Both light up and curve upward into a shared box holding 81, labelled 9 squared equals 81 and negative 9 squared equals 81, because like signs multiply to a positive. A line then poses the problem: if the radical meant either 9 or negative 9, it would not name a single number. The negative-9 arc fades to grey while the 9 arc turns rust, and the radical lands on its principal value, radical 81 equals 9. A final line shows the two-step order for the negative root: radical 81 equals 9 first, then negate, giving negative radical 81 equals negative 9. A closing note contrasts the sign sitting outside the radical here with a negative number underneath it, which is a different case. −9 9 81 (−9)² = 81 9² = 81 If √81 meant either 9 or −9, it would not name a single number. √81 = 9 √81 = 9 root first −√81 = −9 then negate − outside the radical is fine here — a negative radicand is different

Definition 0.4.7: two numbers square to 81, so the radical returns only the nonnegative one.

Same "negate afterward" structure as the absolute-value expressions in §0.2.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Definition

Perfect square

Definition 0.4.8 — Perfect square

A perfect square is a number that is the square of an integer. Its square root is an integer.

Knowing the first fifteen on sight is worth the small effort — it makes simplifying radicals fast, and it is the recognition step behind factoring quadratics in Chapter 7.

A perfect square is a count of dots that fills a complete square with nothing left over Dot arrays build up left to right for 1, 4, 9, 16 and 25 dots, each one closing into a complete square with its side length labelled 1 through 5 and its count labelled beneath. Then 20 dots try the same thing: a 4 by 4 block of 16 sits inside a dashed boundary the size of a complete square, but 4 more dots are left over in a ragged row below it and do not fit inside that boundary. Because 20 sits between the perfect squares 16 and 25, the statement 4 less than the square root of 20 less than 5 appears below. A footer strip lists the first fifteen perfect squares, n from 1 to 15 over n squared. 1 1 2 4 3 9 4 16 5 25 20 4 < √20 < 5 n 12345 678910 1112131415 1491625 36496481100 121144169196225

Definition 0.4.8: a perfect square fills a complete square of dots with nothing left over.

1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169, 196, 225.

Squares of 1 through 15.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — When a square root is not a real number

Inside the radical or outside it

ExpressionValueReason
49\sqrt{49}77the principal, nonnegative root
49-\sqrt{49}7-7take the root first, then negate
49\sqrt{-49}not realnothing real squares to a negative
0\sqrt{0}0002=00^2 = 0
(7)2(-7)^24949like signs give a positive product

Table 0.4.12: Rows 2 and 3 differ only in whether the sign is inside the radical.

A positive squared is positive, a negative squared is positive, and zero squared is zero — so no real number squares to a negative.

This is a real gap in the number system, not an oversight, and it is why a later course introduces imaginary numbers. For now treat it like division by zero: an expression with no value among the numbers we have.

Do not confuse 49\sqrt{-49} with 49=7-\sqrt{49} = -7, which is perfectly fine.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Context Pause — a radical does not split across a plus sign

Simplify underneath first

259=16=4\sqrt{25 - 9} = \sqrt{16} = 4, while 259=53=2\sqrt{25} - \sqrt{9} = 5 - 3 = 2.

Different answers, so the grouping is not optional. The radical groups everything under it, exactly as the fraction bar and the absolute-value bars do.

Third grouping symbol in three sections — the pattern is the point.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Worked example

Simplifying, and estimating a root

Example 0.4.6 — simplify   236259\;2\sqrt{36} - \sqrt{25 - 9}


Grouping first, then both roots, then multiplication before subtraction.

23616=2(6)4=82\sqrt{36} - \sqrt{16} = 2(6) - 4 = 8

Most numbers are not perfect squares. Pin the root between the perfect squares on either side:

7=49<55<64=87 = \sqrt{49} < \sqrt{55} < \sqrt{64} = 8

Squaring candidates closes in: 7.412=54.90817.41^2 = 54.9081, 7.422=55.05647.42^2 = 55.0564, so 557.42\sqrt{55} \approx 7.42.

† Estimating is not a lesser substitute for a calculator; it is how you catch a mistyped key. If a calculator reports 5524.1\sqrt{55} \approx 24.1, the estimate tells you instantly that something went in wrong.

Answer 8.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Definition

Rational number

Definition 0.4.9 — Rational number

A rational number can be written as a ratio pq\dfrac{p}{q} of two integers, q0q \neq 0. The name comes from ratio, not from reasonable.

It swallows nearly everything so far: 12=12112 = \tfrac{12}{1}, 7=71-7 = \tfrac{-7}{1}, 2.6=1352.6 = \tfrac{13}{5}, 0.6=230.\overline{6} = \tfrac{2}{3}.

Five familiar numbers, each rewritten as a ratio of two integers Five numbers appear in their everyday form on the left, each with a curved arrow to its ratio form on the right, landing in rust. Three fourths is already a ratio. Twelve becomes twelve over one. Negative seven becomes negative seven over one. Two point six becomes thirteen over five. Zero point six repeating, shown with a bar drawn over the six, becomes two over three. A closing note records that the name rational comes from ratio, not from reasonable, and that q not equal zero is part of the definition. 3 4 3 4 12 12 1 −7 −7 1 2.6 13 5 0. 6 2 3 the name comes from ratio, not from reasonable q ≠ 0 is part of the definition itself

Definition 0.4.9: five familiar numbers, each rewritten as a ratio of two integers.

A test you can run by eye: a number is rational exactly when its decimal terminates or repeats. Both directions hold — the remainders in a division can only take finitely many values, so eventually one repeats and the digits cycle.

That leaves room for a third kind of decimal — one that runs forever without settling.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Definition

Irrational number

Definition 0.4.10 — Irrational number

An irrational number is a real number that is not rational. Its decimal neither terminates nor repeats.

Two families supply most examples: roots of non-perfect-squares, like 55=7.4161984\sqrt{55} = 7.4161984\ldots, and π=3.14159265\pi = 3.14159265\ldots.

An irrational number's decimal never terminates and never repeats Three decimal tapes run side by side. Three eighths equals zero point three seven five and stops, marked with a curved end cap labelled terminates. Five sixths equals zero point eight three three three and locks into a cycle, with a bar drawn over the repeating block of threes, labelled repeats. The square root of fifty five equals seven point four one six one nine eight four and keeps producing digits that never settle into a block, fading under an ellipsis, labelled neither. A closing line states that a number is rational exactly when its decimal terminates or repeats, so the third tape is what irrational names. Two further notes record that pi is also irrational, with 3.14 and 22 over 7 as rational approximations that never equal it, and that the square root of 36 is rational while the square root of 35 is irrational because only one of those numbers underneath is a perfect square. 3/8 = 0.375 terminates 5/6 = 0.8333 repeats √55 = 7.4161984 neither Rational exactly when the decimal terminates or repeats. That’s what “irrational” names — decimals that do neither. π = 3.14159265… is irrational; 3.14 and 22/7 only approximate it. √36 = 6 is rational; √35 is irrational — perfect-square status decides it.

Definition 0.4.10: one decimal stops, one repeats, and one does neither.

The radical sign is not what makes a number irrational. 36=6\sqrt{36} = 6 is rational; 35\sqrt{35} is not. Whether the number underneath is a perfect square is what decides. And 3.143.14 and 227\tfrac{22}{7} are rational approximations — which is exactly why neither equals π\pi.

The square root of any whole number that is not a perfect square is irrational.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Definition

Real number

Definition 0.4.11 — Real number

A real number is any number that is either rational or irrational — equivalently, any number with a location on the number line.

countingwholeintegerrationalreal\text{counting} \subset \text{whole} \subset \text{integer} \subset \text{rational} \subset \text{real}
A real number is any number that is rational or irrational, with a location on the number line Four nested rings grow outward: counting holds 12, whole adds 0, integer adds negative seven, and rational adds three fourths, negative two point six, zero point four five repeating, and square root nine, which simplifies to 3 and so is drawn back inside the innermost counting ring. Beside the nested rings, not inside them, an irrational box holds square root thirty five and pi. A real boundary encloses both the nested rings and the irrational box, and the chain counting subset whole subset integer subset rational subset real accumulates above it. Square root negative sixteen sits in a dashed circle outside the real boundary, labelled not real, because it belongs to nothing on the chart. In the final beat the whole diagram resolves into a horizontal number line: integers sit at evenly spaced ticks, two point six sits six tenths of the way from 2 to 3, negative three fourths sits three quarters of the way from 0 toward negative 1, and square root fifty five lands just past seven point four. The line is drawn solid in the accent colour end to end, completely filled with no gaps anywhere. counting ⊂ whole ⊂ integer ⊂ rational ⊂ real real rational integer whole counting 12 0 −7 3/4 −2.6 0.45 √9 = 3 irrational √35 π not nested √−16 not real −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 −3/4 2.6 √55

Definition 0.4.11: the sets nest outward, the irrationals sit beside them, and together they fill the line.

The irrationals are the one set that does not nest — they sit beside the rationals rather than inside them. Together the two make up the reals.

A number in an inner set automatically belongs to every set outside it.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Three rows carry the whole idea

Which sets each number belongs to

NumberCountingWholeIntegerRationalIrrationalReal
1212yesyesyesyesyes
00yesyesyesyes
7-7yesyesyes
2.6-2.6yesyes
0.450.\overline{45}yesyes
9\sqrt{9}yesyesyesyesyes
35\sqrt{35}yesyes
π\piyesyes
16\sqrt{-16}not real

Table 0.4.13: 9\sqrt{9} looks exotic and is simply 3 — always simplify before you classify.

35\sqrt{35} sits one line away and belongs to none of the inner sets; 16\sqrt{-16} belongs to nothing on the chart.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Worked example

Classifying numbers

Example 0.4.7 — list every set each belongs to: 64\sqrt{64}, 52-\dfrac{5}{2}, 20\sqrt{20}


64=8\sqrt{64} = 8 — simplify first. A counting number, so also whole, integer, rational (81)\left(\tfrac{8}{1}\right), and real.

52-\dfrac{5}{2} — already a ratio of integers, so rational and real. Negative and not whole, so none of counting, whole, integer. As a decimal it is 2.5-2.5, which terminates.

20\boldsymbol{\sqrt{20}} — 20 sits between 16 and 25, so 4<20<54 < \sqrt{20} < 5 and it is not an integer. Irrational and real.

Simplify, then classify — in that order, every time.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — No gaps anywhere

The reals fill the line completely

§0.2's number line held the integers as evenly spaced ticks. Fractions and decimals fill the space between them — 2.62.6 sits six tenths of the way from 2 to 3, and 34-\tfrac{3}{4} three quarters of the way from 0 toward 1-1.

The irrationals take the positions that are left over: 55\sqrt{55} has a definite spot just past 7.4, even though no finite decimal names it exactly.

That completeness is what lets Chapter 5 talk about the graph of a line as one solid unbroken object instead of a dotted trail of points — and why §0.5's properties can be stated for all real numbers at once.

The payoff slide — it is why the whole classification exercise mattered.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4.4 — Your turn

Try It Now 0.4.4

Try It Now 0.4.4 — simplify   10034\;\sqrt{100} - 3\sqrt{4}; is 9\sqrt{-9} real; name every set 49\sqrt{49} belongs to


10034=103(2)=4\sqrt{100} - 3\sqrt{4} = 10 - 3(2) = 4

9\sqrt{-9} is not real — it would need a number whose square is 9-9, and positives, negatives and zero all square to non-negatives.

49=7\sqrt{49} = 7 — counting, whole, integer, rational, real.

Answers 4; not real; all five sets.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

Key Terminology — the words this section defines

Key terms

decimal point — separates the whole-number places from the fractional ones.

trailing zero — a zero at the right end of the fractional part; never changes the value.

terminating decimal — its digits stop; the division reaches remainder zero.

repeating decimal — a block repeats forever, written with a bar over it.

percent — a fraction with denominator 100, written with %\%.

square root — a number whose square is mm, written m\sqrt{m}.

principal square root — the nonnegative one; what     \sqrt{\;\;} always means.

perfect square — the square of an integer.

rational number — a ratio of two integers; terminates or repeats.

irrational number — real but not rational; neither terminates nor repeats.

real number — rational or irrational; anything with a spot on the line.

Second column reveals on click.
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

The headline result

A number is rational exactly when its decimal terminates or repeats

Both directions hold, and the reason is finite: a division has only finitely many possible remainders, so one must eventually recur — and from that point the quotient digits cycle.

That single fact links the notation half of this section to the classification half, and it is why you can sort a number by looking at its decimal.

† It also tells you what irrationality has to look like: a decimal with no end and no pattern. π\pi and 55\sqrt{55} qualify; 3.143.14 and 227\tfrac{22}{7} do not, which is precisely why they are approximations rather than equalities.

One headline result — the rest folds into the conclusions cards.
0.4
Decimals · bookSHelf Integrated Math 1§0.4

§0.4 — Conclusions

What to carry forward

The one idea

Decimals, fractions and percents are one number in three notations, and place value governs all of them. Beyond that, the reals divide cleanly into rationals and irrationals — and together they fill the number line with no gaps.

Where it goes wrong

Judging size by digit count, right-aligning instead of aligning the points, miscounting decimal places in a product, moving only the divisor's point, writing 0.8%0.8\% as 0.80.8, splitting a radical across a plus sign, and classifying before simplifying.

Next: §0.5 Properties of Real Numbers — the rules that let you rearrange all of this on purpose instead of by guessing. Back to start.

Every listed failure has a size or place-value check that catches it.