Integrated Math 1 · Unit 0 · Review of the Essentials
The place-value pattern from §0.1 run the other way — then fractions, percents, square roots, and the number line filled in completely.
bookSHelf · Integrated Math 1 · §0.4 · a self-paced section
Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to
§0.4.1 — Decimal notation and rounding
Definition 0.4.1 — Decimal point
The decimal point separates the whole-number places from the fractional places. Every place to its right is worth one tenth of the place immediately before it.
§0.1's places ran ones, tens, hundreds — each ten times the one to its right. Nothing stops the pattern running the other way.
Definition 0.4.1: the places mirror around the ones place, and the point marks where the whole-number part ends.
§0.4.1 — Two letters, four orders of magnitude
| Place | Position | As a fraction | As a decimal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tens | 2 left | 10 | 10 |
| Ones | 1 left | 1 | 1 |
| Tenths | 1 right | 101 | 0.1 |
| Hundredths | 2 right | 1001 | 0.01 |
| Thousandths | 3 right | 1,0001 | 0.001 |
| Ten-thousandths | 4 right | 10,0001 | 0.0001 |
Table 0.4.1: There is no "oneths" place — ones is the pivot the pattern reflects around.
The "-th" ending does real work. Ten thousand is large; one ten-thousandth is tiny. Two letters are the entire difference between 10,000 and 0.0001.
36.407=3(10)+6(1)+4(101)+7(1,0001)The hundredths zero is a placeholder. Delete it and 36.407 collapses to 36.47 — a different number.
§0.4.1 — Reading decimals aloud
Procedure — naming a decimal
1. Name the whole-number part.
2. Say "and" for the decimal point.
3. Name the digits right of the point as if they were a whole number.
4. Name the place of the last digit.
| Decimal | Read as |
|---|---|
| 0.062 | sixty-two thousandths |
| 7.4 | seven and four tenths |
| 7.04 | seven and four hundredths |
| 12.385 | twelve and three hundred eighty-five thousandths |
| 0.0009 | nine ten-thousandths |
Table 0.4.2: 7.4 and 7.04 differ by one zero — and that zero costs the 4 a factor of ten.
Context Pause — why "and" is off limits inside a whole number
§0.1 said 204 is "two hundred four," never "two hundred and four." Now you can see why.
"And" is reserved for the decimal point, so "two hundred and four" would be indistinguishable from 200.4 when spoken aloud.
§0.4.1 — Worked example
Example 0.4.1 — write "nine and forty-six thousandths" in standard form; then read 0.207 aloud
The phrase names thousandths, so the last digit goes three places right of the point. The digits are 46 — the 6 takes thousandths, the 4 takes hundredths, and tenths needs a placeholder zero.
9.0460.207 has no whole part; the last digit sits in thousandths — "two hundred seven thousandths."
† "Five and eighty-one thousandths" is 5.081, not 5.81. Writing the second multiplies the fractional part by ten.
Insight — dollars before dimes
Think of tenths as dimes and hundredths as pennies. Someone with 7 dimes has more than someone with 6 dimes and 8 pennies, no matter how many coins each is holding.
You compare the big places first and only look at the small ones to break a tie. So 0.7>0.68, even though 0.68 has more digits.
§0.4.1 — Comparing decimals
| Comparison | Padded to match | First place they differ | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.7 and 0.68 | 0.70 and 0.68 | tenths: 7 beats 6 | 0.7>0.68 |
| 0.325 and 0.33 | 0.325 and 0.330 | hundredths: 2 loses to 3 | 0.325<0.33 |
| 4.9 and 4.90 | 4.90 and 4.90 | they never differ | 4.9=4.90 |
| 0.08 and 0.1 | 0.08 and 0.10 | tenths: 0 loses to 1 | 0.08<0.1 |
| −0.4 and −0.35 | −0.40 and −0.35 | negatives flip the order | −0.4<−0.35 |
Table 0.4.3: Padding is safe — 0.7=0.70=0.700, since 107=10070.
The §0.2 rule still runs everything: a number is greater than whatever sits to its left, no matter how many decimal places it carries.
§0.4.1 — Rounding a decimal
Procedure — rounding a decimal
1. Find the digit in the place you are rounding to.
2. Look at the digit immediately to its right.
3. If it is 5 or more, add 1. Otherwise leave it alone.
4. Drop every digit to the right — do not replace them with zeros.
| Round 8.4763 to | Digit right of it | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Tenths | 7 — round up | 8.5 |
| Hundredths | 6 — round up | 8.48 |
| Thousandths | 3 — leave it | 8.476 |
| Whole number | 4 — leave it | 8 |
Table 0.4.4: Four places, four different answers — every one from the original.
† Step 4 is the change. Rounding 6,473 to hundreds needed the zeros in 6,500, because those places carry value. Right of the point a trailing zero carries none.
Context Pause — rollover carries just like addition
It becomes 10 and carries into the next place. Rounding 2.397 to hundredths turns the 9 into 10, which carries into the tenths, giving 2.40.
That trailing zero stays, because here it reports how precise the answer is — the one case where a trailing zero earns its place.
§0.4.1 — Rounding money
| Exact amount | To the nearest cent | Why |
|---|---|---|
| $47.3826 | $47.38 | thousandths digit is 2, so leave the 8 alone |
| $47.3852 | $47.39 | thousandths digit is 5, so the 8 becomes 9 |
| $9.995 | $10.00 | the nines roll over and carry into the dollars |
| $0.4499 | $0.45 | thousandths digit is 9, so the 4 becomes 5 |
Table 0.4.5: Tax, per-unit prices, interest and gasoline all compute to more than two places before anyone rounds.
Carry the exact value all the way through and round only at the very end. Rounding partway is the same chained-rounding mistake — and on a long receipt those errors add into a total that visibly disagrees with the register.
§0.4.1 — Worked example
Example 0.4.2 — a jacket costs $18.95; tax at 7.25% is exactly $1.373875
In $1.373875 the hundredths digit is 7 and the digit to its right is 3. Since 3 is less than 5, the 7 stays and the rest is dropped.
$1.373875→$1.37Line up the decimal points and add.
$18.95+$1.37=$20.32The tax was rounded once, at the end of the tax computation — which is what a register does.
§0.4.1 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.4.1 — write "six and ninety-four hundredths"; decide which is larger, 0.409 or 0.41; round 0.409 to the nearest hundredth
94 fills tenths and hundredths exactly — no placeholder needed.
6.940.409vs0.410⇒0.409<0.410.409→0.41Tenths match at 4; hundredths are 0 against 1. Then rounding: the hundredths digit is 0 and 9 follows it, so the 0 becomes 1.
§0.4.2 — Operations with decimals
Definition 0.4.2 — Trailing zero
A trailing zero sits at the right end of the fractional part. It never changes the value, so you may add or remove them freely to make places line up.
12.403.75+0.6016.75Definition 0.4.2: appending zeros re-slices the same amount into finer pieces without moving its edge.
You can only add quantities of the same kind. Tenths add to tenths — never straight to hundredths, any more than 3 hours add to 8 minutes. Line up the points, not the edges.
§0.4.2 — Multiplying: count the decimal places
| Product | Ignoring the points | Places | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4×3.5 | 24×35=840 | 1+1 | 8.4 |
| 0.7×0.03 | 7×3=21 | 1+2 | 0.021 |
| 1.6×0.45 | 16×45=720 | 1+2 | 0.72 |
| 0.5×0.5 | 5×5=25 | 1+1 | 0.25 |
| 12×0.08 | 12×8=96 | 0+2 | 0.96 |
Table 0.4.6: Places in the product = places in the first factor + places in the second.
One place plus two places gives three because 101⋅102=103. The zeros in the denominator are the decimal places.
† Row 4: 0.5×0.5=0.25 is smaller than either factor. Multiplying by a number between 0 and 1 shrinks things — an instinct built on whole numbers has to go before Chapter 2.
§0.4.2 — Worked example
Example 0.4.3 — compute 0.24×3.5
Drop the points: 24×35=840. Two places in 0.24 and one in 3.5 means 2+1=3 places, so count three left from the right end of 840.
0.840=0.84Sanity check: 0.24 is about a quarter, and a quarter of 3.5 is a little less than 1 — so 0.84 is believable.
§0.4.2 — Dividing by a decimal
| Problem | Shift both by | Rewritten | Answer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.61÷0.3 | 1 place | 86.1÷3 | 28.7 |
| 0.144÷0.06 | 2 places | 14.4÷6 | 2.4 |
| 7÷0.25 | 2 places | 700÷25 | 28 |
| 5.5÷1.1 | 1 place | 55÷11 | 5 |
Table 0.4.7: Moving only the divisor's point changes the answer by a factor of ten.
Multiplying both parts by the same thing leaves the value unchanged — the equivalent-fractions idea from §0.3.
Row 3 is the other instinct to retrain: dividing by a number between 0 and 1 makes things bigger.
§0.4.2 — Multiplying and dividing by powers of ten
| Operation | Point moves | Example |
|---|---|---|
| ×10 | 1 place right | 4.62×10=46.2 |
| ×100 | 2 places right | 4.62×100=462 |
| ×1,000 | 3 places right | 4.62×1,000=4,620 |
| ÷10 | 1 place left | 4.62÷10=0.462 |
| ÷100 | 2 places left | 4.62÷100=0.0462 |
| ÷1,000 | 3 places left | 4.62÷1,000=0.00462 |
Table 0.4.8: Append placeholder zeros whenever the digits run out — row 3 needs one in the ones place.
This shortcut is behind every metric-unit conversion you will ever do, and §1.3 comes back to it as a statement about exponents.
§0.4.2 — Worked example
Example 0.4.4 — simplify 0.6(4.5−1.25)+0.8
Grouping first — pad 4.5 to 4.50 so the places line up. Then multiply: 6×325=1950, needing 1+2=3 places. Then add, padding 0.8 to 0.80.
3.25→1.95→1.95+0.80=2.75† Nothing about the §0.1 order changes. Almost everyone gets the digits right; what separates a correct answer from a wrong one is whether the point in the product landed in the right spot. Count the places before you write the product down.
§0.4.2 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.4.2 — compute 0.9×0.04; then 6.3÷0.7; then simplify 2.5+0.4(6−1.5)
Part 1 needs a placeholder zero in the tenths spot.
§0.4.3 — Decimals, fractions, and percents
Fractions are exact and are what algebra prefers. Decimals are easiest to compare and are what a calculator hands you. Percents are the clearest way to report a proportion to another person.
The name is the fraction. 0.36 is "thirty-six hundredths," so 10036=259. The denominator is always the place value of the last digit.
Being fluent means converting without stopping to think, because a problem almost never arrives in the notation you want to work in.
§0.4.3 — Definition
Definition 0.4.3 — Terminating decimal
A terminating decimal is a decimal whose digits stop. The division reaches a remainder of zero.
Definition 0.4.3: it stops because the division reaches a remainder of zero.
§0.4.3 — Definition
Definition 0.4.4 — Repeating decimal
A repeating decimal is one in which a block of digits repeats forever. The division never reaches remainder zero; a remainder comes back around, and the quotient digits cycle.
The bar is not decoration — it states that the block goes on without end, which 0.8333… only hints at.
Definition 0.4.4: a remainder that comes back around is what makes the digits cycle forever.
Watch where each bar starts. In 0.83 only the 3 repeats, so it is 0.8333…. In 0.36 the pair repeats as a block: 0.363636….
§0.4.3 — Predicting which fractions terminate
| Fraction | Denominator factored | Only 2s and 5s? | Prediction | Actual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83 | 2⋅2⋅2 | yes | terminates | 0.375 |
| 207 | 2⋅2⋅5 | yes | terminates | 0.35 |
| 65 | 2⋅3 | no, there is a 3 | repeats | 0.83 |
| 114 | 11 | no, there is an 11 | repeats | 0.36 |
Table 0.4.9: 2 and 5 are the two primes that divide 10 — any other prime factor forces a repeat.
Reduce first — not optional. 156 has a 3 in the denominator and predicts a repeat, but in lowest terms it is 52=0.4, which terminates. Test the fraction in lowest terms, not whatever form you were handed.
§0.4.3 — Definition
Definition 0.4.5 — Percent
A percent is a fraction whose denominator is 100, written with % in place of the denominator.
So 42%=10042=0.42. Percent → decimal: drop the %, move the point two places left. Decimal → percent: move it two right, attach the %.
Definition 0.4.5: the percent sign stands in for a denominator of 100.
Insight — a percent is a score out of 100
If you got 17 out of 20 on a quiz, nobody compares that to 43 out of 50 in their head.
Rewriting both as scores out of 100 makes them line up instantly — and that rewriting is all a percent is.
§0.4.3 — A percent need not land between 0 and 100
| Percent | Decimal | Fraction in lowest terms |
|---|---|---|
| 75% | 0.75 | 43 |
| 8% | 0.08 | 252 |
| 125% | 1.25 | 45 |
| 0.8% | 0.008 | 1251 |
| 250% | 2.5 | 25 |
Table 0.4.10: Rows 3 and 4 contradict a widespread belief.
125% is a perfectly good number — it is 1.25, more than the whole — and it turns up any time something grows past its original size.
0.8% is less than one percent. Writing it as 0.8 is an error by a factor of one hundred: 1000.8=0.008.
§0.4.3 — Worth recognizing on sight
| Fraction | Decimal | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 0.5 | 50% |
| 31 | 0.3 | 3331% |
| 32 | 0.6 | 6632% |
| 41 | 0.25 | 25% |
| 43 | 0.75 | 75% |
| 51 | 0.2 | 20% |
| Fraction | Decimal | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | 0.4 | 40% |
| 81 | 0.125 | 12.5% |
| 83 | 0.375 | 37.5% |
| 101 | 0.1 | 10% |
| 1001 | 0.01 | 1% |
| 1 | 1.0 | 100% |
Table 0.4.11: The 31 row is why you see 3331% rather than 33.3% — the decimal repeats forever, so a decimal percent is rounded while the fraction is exact.
§0.4.3 — Worked example
Example 0.4.5 — convert 83 to a decimal then a percent; convert 24% to a decimal then a fraction
The bar means division; moving the point two places converts either way; the denominator is the place value of the last digit.
§0.4.3 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.4.3 — convert 0.45 to a fraction and a percent; then decide which is largest: 85, 0.63, or 61%
Put all three in one notation — decimals rank by place value with no common denominator to hunt for.
85=0.6250.63=0.63061%=0.610All three have 6 tenths; hundredths are 2, 3 and 1, so 0.63 is largest.
§0.4.4 — Square roots and the real numbers
Definition 0.4.6 — Square root and the radical sign
A square root of m is a number whose square is m, written m; the symbol is the radical sign.
81=9because92=81Definition 0.4.6: squaring asks what 9 rows of 9 come to; the square root asks the reverse.
A subtlety hides in that line: both 9 and −9 square to 81. If 81 meant "either one" it would not name a single number, and every expression containing it would be ambiguous.
§0.4.4 — Definition
Definition 0.4.7 — Principal square root
The principal square root of a nonnegative number is its nonnegative square root. m always means the principal root, so 81=9 and never −9.
To ask for the negative root, put the sign outside: −81=−9. The radical groups — finish everything underneath, then apply the outside sign.
Definition 0.4.7: two numbers square to 81, so the radical returns only the nonnegative one.
§0.4.4 — Definition
Definition 0.4.8 — Perfect square
A perfect square is a number that is the square of an integer. Its square root is an integer.
Knowing the first fifteen on sight is worth the small effort — it makes simplifying radicals fast, and it is the recognition step behind factoring quadratics in Chapter 7.
Definition 0.4.8: a perfect square fills a complete square of dots with nothing left over.
1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100, 121, 144, 169, 196, 225.
§0.4.4 — When a square root is not a real number
| Expression | Value | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| 49 | 7 | the principal, nonnegative root |
| −49 | −7 | take the root first, then negate |
| −49 | not real | nothing real squares to a negative |
| 0 | 0 | 02=0 |
| (−7)2 | 49 | like signs give a positive product |
Table 0.4.12: Rows 2 and 3 differ only in whether the sign is inside the radical.
A positive squared is positive, a negative squared is positive, and zero squared is zero — so no real number squares to a negative.
This is a real gap in the number system, not an oversight, and it is why a later course introduces imaginary numbers. For now treat it like division by zero: an expression with no value among the numbers we have.
Context Pause — a radical does not split across a plus sign
25−9=16=4, while 25−9=5−3=2.
Different answers, so the grouping is not optional. The radical groups everything under it, exactly as the fraction bar and the absolute-value bars do.
§0.4.4 — Worked example
Example 0.4.6 — simplify 236−25−9
Grouping first, then both roots, then multiplication before subtraction.
236−16=2(6)−4=8Most numbers are not perfect squares. Pin the root between the perfect squares on either side:
7=49<55<64=8Squaring candidates closes in: 7.412=54.9081, 7.422=55.0564, so 55≈7.42.
† Estimating is not a lesser substitute for a calculator; it is how you catch a mistyped key. If a calculator reports 55≈24.1, the estimate tells you instantly that something went in wrong.
§0.4.4 — Definition
Definition 0.4.9 — Rational number
A rational number can be written as a ratio qp of two integers, q=0. The name comes from ratio, not from reasonable.
It swallows nearly everything so far: 12=112, −7=1−7, 2.6=513, 0.6=32.
Definition 0.4.9: five familiar numbers, each rewritten as a ratio of two integers.
A test you can run by eye: a number is rational exactly when its decimal terminates or repeats. Both directions hold — the remainders in a division can only take finitely many values, so eventually one repeats and the digits cycle.
§0.4.4 — Definition
Definition 0.4.10 — Irrational number
An irrational number is a real number that is not rational. Its decimal neither terminates nor repeats.
Two families supply most examples: roots of non-perfect-squares, like 55=7.4161984…, and π=3.14159265….
Definition 0.4.10: one decimal stops, one repeats, and one does neither.
The radical sign is not what makes a number irrational. 36=6 is rational; 35 is not. Whether the number underneath is a perfect square is what decides. And 3.14 and 722 are rational approximations — which is exactly why neither equals π.
§0.4.4 — Definition
Definition 0.4.11 — Real number
A real number is any number that is either rational or irrational — equivalently, any number with a location on the number line.
counting⊂whole⊂integer⊂rational⊂realDefinition 0.4.11: the sets nest outward, the irrationals sit beside them, and together they fill the line.
The irrationals are the one set that does not nest — they sit beside the rationals rather than inside them. Together the two make up the reals.
§0.4.4 — Three rows carry the whole idea
| Number | Counting | Whole | Integer | Rational | Irrational | Real |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| 0 | yes | yes | yes | yes | ||
| −7 | yes | yes | yes | |||
| −2.6 | yes | yes | ||||
| 0.45 | yes | yes | ||||
| 9 | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes | |
| 35 | yes | yes | ||||
| π | yes | yes | ||||
| −16 | not real |
Table 0.4.13: 9 looks exotic and is simply 3 — always simplify before you classify.
§0.4.4 — Worked example
Example 0.4.7 — list every set each belongs to: 64, −25, 20
64=8 — simplify first. A counting number, so also whole, integer, rational (18), and real.
−25 — already a ratio of integers, so rational and real. Negative and not whole, so none of counting, whole, integer. As a decimal it is −2.5, which terminates.
20 — 20 sits between 16 and 25, so 4<20<5 and it is not an integer. Irrational and real.
§0.4.4 — No gaps anywhere
§0.2's number line held the integers as evenly spaced ticks. Fractions and decimals fill the space between them — 2.6 sits six tenths of the way from 2 to 3, and −43 three quarters of the way from 0 toward −1.
The irrationals take the positions that are left over: 55 has a definite spot just past 7.4, even though no finite decimal names it exactly.
That completeness is what lets Chapter 5 talk about the graph of a line as one solid unbroken object instead of a dotted trail of points — and why §0.5's properties can be stated for all real numbers at once.
§0.4.4 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.4.4 — simplify 100−34; is −9 real; name every set 49 belongs to
−9 is not real — it would need a number whose square is −9, and positives, negatives and zero all square to non-negatives.
49=7 — counting, whole, integer, rational, real.
Key Terminology — the words this section defines
decimal point — separates the whole-number places from the fractional ones.
trailing zero — a zero at the right end of the fractional part; never changes the value.
terminating decimal — its digits stop; the division reaches remainder zero.
repeating decimal — a block repeats forever, written with a bar over it.
percent — a fraction with denominator 100, written with %.
square root — a number whose square is m, written m.
principal square root — the nonnegative one; what always means.
perfect square — the square of an integer.
rational number — a ratio of two integers; terminates or repeats.
irrational number — real but not rational; neither terminates nor repeats.
real number — rational or irrational; anything with a spot on the line.
The headline result
A number is rational exactly when its decimal terminates or repeats
Both directions hold, and the reason is finite: a division has only finitely many possible remainders, so one must eventually recur — and from that point the quotient digits cycle.
That single fact links the notation half of this section to the classification half, and it is why you can sort a number by looking at its decimal.
† It also tells you what irrationality has to look like: a decimal with no end and no pattern. π and 55 qualify; 3.14 and 722 do not, which is precisely why they are approximations rather than equalities.
§0.4 — Conclusions
Decimals, fractions and percents are one number in three notations, and place value governs all of them. Beyond that, the reals divide cleanly into rationals and irrationals — and together they fill the number line with no gaps.
Judging size by digit count, right-aligning instead of aligning the points, miscounting decimal places in a product, moving only the divisor's point, writing 0.8% as 0.8, splitting a radical across a plus sign, and classifying before simplifying.
Next: §0.5 Properties of Real Numbers — the rules that let you rearrange all of this on purpose instead of by guessing. Back to start.