Integrated Math 1 · Unit 0 · Review of the Essentials
The list of legal moves. Every rewriting you have done since §0.1 was one of these, and Chapter 3 will ask you to name them.
bookSHelf · Integrated Math 1 · §0.5 · a self-paced section
Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to
§0.5.1 — Commutative and associative properties
For addition and multiplication, no. For subtraction and division, yes.
Same answer both times — and forgetting it is a reliable way to get a wrong answer.
That freedom is worth a lot: it is what lets you hunt for the convenient arrangement before computing anything.
§0.5.1 — Definition
Definition 0.5.1 — Commutative Property
For any real numbers a and b,
a+b=b+aa⋅b=b⋅aChanging the order does not change the sum or the product. Commute means to travel back and forth — the two numbers swap seats and nothing else changes.
Definition 0.5.1: swapping the two numbers leaves a sum or product alone, and changes a difference or quotient.
Context Pause — one counterexample settles it
So a single pair where it fails is enough to sink it.
You do not need to test subtraction on a hundred pairs to know it is not commutative. One pair does the job — which is exactly why the next two lines matter so much.
§0.5.1 — The half students skip
| Operation | Commutative? | The test | What happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| Addition | yes | 9+4=13 and 4+9=13 | same result |
| Multiplication | yes | 6⋅7=42 and 7⋅6=42 | same result |
| Subtraction | no | 11−4=7 and 4−11=−7 | opposite results |
| Division | no | 18÷6=3 and 6÷18=31 | reciprocal results |
Table 0.5.1: This costs students points for years.
Same warning §0.1 gave about translating words: "5 less than n" is n−5 and not 5−n because subtraction is not commutative. If it were, the distinction would not exist.
§0.5.1 — Definition
Definition 0.5.2 — Associative Property
For any real numbers a, b and c,
(a+b)+c=a+(b+c)(ab)c=a(bc)The order stays exactly the same in both statements. Only the parentheses move.
Definition 0.5.2: the fence moves, the numbers stay where they are, and the total holds.
(4⋅25)⋅17=100⋅17=1700 and 4⋅(25⋅17)=4⋅425=1700. Both routes land in the same place — but the first is much easier to walk.
Insight — swapping seats versus moving the fences
3+8 becomes 8+3. They change seats.
(3+8)+5 becomes 3+(8+5). Same seats, different fence.
Because grouping is free for addition and multiplication, we can write a+b+c and abc with no parentheses at all. That is not true of a−b−c, which the order of operations settles left to right by convention, not by property.
§0.5.1 — Using both properties on purpose
| As written | Rearranged | Why that helps | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| 58+27+42 | (58+42)+27 | the first pair makes 100 | 127 |
| 5⋅39⋅20 | (5⋅20)⋅39 | the first pair makes 100 | 3900 |
| −16+91+16 | (−16+16)+91 | the first pair cancels to 0 | 91 |
| 43⋅23⋅34 | (43⋅34)⋅23 | the first pair multiplies to 1 | 23 |
Table 0.5.2: Good mental arithmetic is mostly this habit.
The last two rows preview §0.5.2. Pairing a number with its opposite, or with its reciprocal, makes the pair vanish — the most useful rearrangement of all.
§0.5.1 — Worked example
Example 0.5.1 — simplify 12+(n+5), naming the property behind each step
Commutative property of addition — move the 5 in front of the n.
12+(5+n)Associative property of addition — regroup so 12 and 5 share a set.
(12+5)+n=17+nWe could not have added 12 and 5 in the original, because the parentheses grouped the 5 with the n. The two properties are what let us take that grouping apart and rebuild it differently.
§0.5.1 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.5.1 — simplify (y+9)+14; then compute 25⋅17⋅4 mentally
Regroup so the numbers sit together — associative property of addition.
y+(9+14)=y+23Swap so 25 and 4 are neighbours (commutative), regroup them (associative), and take the easy pair first.
(25⋅4)⋅17=100⋅17=1700§0.5.2 — Identity and inverse properties
Definition 0.5.3 — Additive Identity
The number 0 is the additive identity: for any real number a,
a+0=a0+a=aSome numbers do nothing at all. That sounds useless, and it is one of the most useful facts in algebra.
Definition 0.5.3: zero is the jump that goes nowhere, and the place a number and its opposite land.
§0.5.2 — Definition
Definition 0.5.4 — Multiplicative Identity
The number 1 is the multiplicative identity: for any real number a,
a⋅1=a1⋅a=aEach is the one number that does nothing to its own operation.
Definition 0.5.4: one is the factor that moves nothing, and where a number meets its reciprocal.
0 is not the multiplicative identity. Multiplying by zero does not leave a number alone — it wipes the number out, which is §0.5.4's business.
§0.5.2 — Definitions
Definition 0.5.5 — Additive Inverse
The additive inverse of a is −a, the number that adds to it to give the additive identity:
a+(−a)=0It is the opposite from §0.2 — same distance from zero, other side.
Definition 0.5.6 — Multiplicative Inverse
The multiplicative inverse of a, where a=0, is a1:
a⋅a1=1It is the reciprocal from §0.3 — flip the fraction over.
A whole number n is really 1n, so its reciprocal is n1.
§0.5.2 — Read across each row and check
| Number | Additive inverse | Multiplicative inverse | Check |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | −8 | 81 | 8+(−8)=0; 8⋅81=1 |
| −5 | 5 | −51 | −5⋅(−51)=1 |
| 94 | −94 | 49 | 94⋅49=1 |
| −72 | 72 | −27 | −72⋅(−27)=1 |
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 is its own reciprocal |
| 0 | 0 | none | no number times 0 gives 1 |
Table 0.5.3: A reciprocal always keeps the sign — a negative times a positive could never give +1. And 0 is its own opposite, which is another way of saying zero is neither positive nor negative.
Context Pause — two ways to say the same thing
Because no number times 0 gives a nonzero result.
Because no number times 0 gives 1.
That is why the multiplicative inverse carries the condition a=0. Watch for that condition — the rest of algebra is full of it, and every appearance traces back to this one place.
Insight — a 1 in disguise
Any fraction with matching top and bottom equals 1: 55, 77, 1212. Multiplying by one of those changes how a fraction looks without changing what it is worth — like trading four quarters for a dollar.
83=83⋅1=83⋅55=4015The value never moved — it got multiplied by 1. That single line justifies every common denominator you have ever found, and reducing is the same move run backwards: 4015=83⋅55, peeling off a factor of 1 rather than cancelling anything mysterious.
§0.5.2 — Choosing the right disguised 1
| Goal | Disguised 1 | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Write 65 with denominator 42 | 77 | 4235 |
| Write 92 with denominator 45 | 55 | 4510 |
| Write 7 as a fraction with denominator 3 | 33 | 321 |
| Add 41+61 | 33 and 22 | 125 |
Table 0.5.4: Ask what turns the denominator you have into the one you want.
§0.5.2 — Worked example
Example 0.5.2 — find and verify both inverses of −103
Additive inverse — flip the sign, then check it lands on the additive identity.
−103+103=0Multiplicative inverse — turn the fraction over, sign stays negative.
−103⋅(−310)=3030=1§0.5.2 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.5.2 — find the reciprocal of −6; rewrite 74 with a denominator of 63
Since 7⋅9=63, the disguised 1 to use is 99.
74⋅99=6336§0.5.3 — The distributive property
Definition 0.5.7 — Distributive Property
For any real numbers a, b, c,
a(b+c)=ab+acThe outside factor gets handed out to everything inside.
6(x+4)=6x+24Definition 0.5.7: one rectangle cut in two, so the outside factor reaches both terms.
The bridge between multiplication and addition — the property you will use more than any other. Test it: 9(20+3)=9⋅23=207, and 9⋅20+9⋅3=207. That second route is how most people multiply in their heads, so you have been distributing for years without a name for it.
Insight — chopping one rectangle into two
Picture a rectangle 6 units tall whose width splits into a piece of length x and a piece of length 4. Measure its area as one rectangle, 6(x+4), or as two added together, 6x+24.
It also explains the most common way to get this wrong. Writing 6(x+4)=6x+4 measures the second rectangle as 4 square units instead of 6⋅4=24. The height applies to both pieces — every term inside gets multiplied, no exceptions.
Context Pause — the minus sign is part of the factor
When you distribute −3, the thing being handed out is −3, not 3.
−3(m−8)=−3⋅m+(−3)(−8)=−3m+24The second term comes out positive, because a negative times a negative is positive — §0.2. The single most common error in beginning algebra is distributing the 3 and leaving the minus behind, producing −3m−24. Most sign errors here are bookkeeping errors, not arithmetic errors.
§0.5.3 — Four ways this goes wrong
| Expression | Correct | Common error | What went wrong |
|---|---|---|---|
| −3(m−8) | −3m+24 | −3m−24 | the minus sign was not distributed |
| −5(2k+3) | −10k−15 | −10k+15 | sign dropped from the second term |
| −(p−6) | −p+6 | −p−6 | the invisible −1 was not distributed |
| 4−2(x+1) | 4−2x−2 | 2(x+1) | subtracted before distributing |
Table 0.5.5: Three sign slips and one order-of-operations slip.
That last row is a different mistake, and a sneaky one. The 4− out front does not combine with the 2 first — multiplication outranks subtraction, so the −2 has to be distributed before anything gets combined.
§0.5.3 — Reading it backwards
Definition 0.5.8 — Common Factor
A common factor appears in every term. Rewriting ab+ac as a(b+c) is factoring out that factor.
12n+18=6⋅2n+6⋅3=6(2n+3)Every property is an equation, and an equation reads in either direction.
Definition 0.5.8: the shared factor lifts out of every term and stands in front.
§0.5.3 — Why like terms combine
| Expression | Common factor | Factored form |
|---|---|---|
| 12n+18 | 6 | 6(2n+3) |
| 15t−25 | 5 | 5(3t−5) |
| 8h+8 | 8 | 8(h+1) |
| −6r−21 | −3 | −3(2r+7) |
Table 0.5.6: Row 3 leaves a 1 behind, not nothing — that second term is 8⋅1.
That middle step is the distributive property read right to left. Combining like terms is not a separate rule — it is factoring out the variable part, adding the coefficients, and putting the variable back.
And 9x2+8x gives x(9x+8) — the parenthesis still has a variable, so nothing collapses.
§0.5.3 — Worked example
Example 0.5.3 — simplify −2(5a−3)+7a, naming the property behind each step
Distributive — hand out the whole factor, sign included.
−10a+6+7aCommutative — move the like terms together.
−10a+7a+6Distributive, backwards — factor out the a, then add the coefficients.
(−10+7)a+6=−3a+6§0.5.3 — Worked example
Example 0.5.4 — simplify 4(2x+5)−3(x−6)
Distribute the 4, then the −3 — the factor is −3, not 3, so −3⋅(−6)=+18.
8x+20−3x+18Group the like terms (commutative), factor out the x (distributive backwards), finish the arithmetic.
(8−3)x+38=5x+38† That is the format Chapter 3 will ask you to produce for equations — every line justified by a named property.
§0.5.3 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.5.3 — simplify −4(3b−2)+5b; then factor 21c−14
Distribute −4 keeping the sign attached, reorder, factor out the b.
−12b+8+5b→(−12+5)b+8=−7b+8Both terms are divisible by 7 — check by distributing back.
21c−14=7(3c−2)§0.5.4 — Properties of zero
Definition 0.5.9 — Multiplication Property of Zero
For any real number a,
a⋅0=00⋅a=0Fifteen groups of nothing is nothing, and nothing groups of fifteen is also nothing. A single zero factor collapses a whole product:
(−8)(93)(0)(41)=0Definition 0.5.9: one zero factor collapses the whole product.
A second property runs the other way, and it is a separate fact: if ab=0, then a=0 or b=0 — because two nonzero reals always have a nonzero product. That sentence is the engine behind solving (x−4)(x+9)=0 in Chapter 7.
Insight — zero is the only product that tells on its factors
You learn almost nothing about the factors — there are infinitely many pairs.
You learn a great deal: at least one of them was 0. There is no other way to reach zero by multiplying.
That asymmetry is exactly why factoring an equation to zero is worth doing — it converts one hard question into a short list of easy ones.
§0.5.4 — Definition
Definition 0.5.10 — Division Involving Zero
For any real a with a=0,
a0=00a is undefinedDivision by zero is undefined for every numerator, including 00.
Definition 0.5.10: zero on top is fine, zero on the bottom is not.
Every division question is really a multiplication question, and that is the fastest way to see why the two cases split apart.
§0.5.4 — Read the third column as the real question
| Expression | Value | The multiplication question |
|---|---|---|
| 130 | 0 | what times 13 gives 0? Only 0. |
| 013 | undefined | what times 0 gives 13? Nothing. |
| 00 | undefined | what times 0 gives 0? Everything. |
| 1313 | 1 | what times 13 gives 13? Only 1. |
Table 0.5.7: One case has no candidates; the other has too many. An expression must name exactly one value.
The rule of thumb is short: zero on top is fine, zero on the bottom is not.
Context Pause — undefined does not mean zero
It means there is no such number, so an expression containing it has no value to report.
Later, denominators will contain variables, and part of your job will be spotting which values would make a denominator zero and ruling them out first.
§0.5.4 — Every property in this section
| Property | Addition | Multiplication |
|---|---|---|
| Commutative | a+b=b+a | ab=ba |
| Associative | (a+b)+c=a+(b+c) | (ab)c=a(bc) |
| Identity | a+0=a | a⋅1=a |
| Inverse | a+(−a)=0 | a⋅a1=1, a=0 |
Table 0.5.8: The four that come in pairs.
| Property | Statement |
|---|---|
| Distributive | a(b+c)=ab+ac |
| Multiplication by zero | a⋅0=0 |
| Division into zero | a0=0, a=0 |
| Division by zero | 0a undefined |
Table 0.5.9: The four that stand alone.
§0.5.4 — Worked example
Example 0.5.5 — evaluate n+2n−5 at n=5, then at n=−2
Numerator zero, denominator not — the safe case. What times 7 gives 0? Only 0.
−2+2−2−5=0−7Now the denominator is zero: what times 0 gives −7? Nothing does, so this has no value.
§0.5.4 — Your turn
Try It Now 0.5.4 — simplify (14)(−77)(0)(3); state 90 and 09
One factor is 0, so the product collapses without any other arithmetic.
90=009 is undefinedWhat times 9 gives 0? Only 0. What times 0 gives 9? Nothing.
Key Terminology — the nine words this section defines
commutative property — changing the order does not change a sum or product.
associative property — changing the grouping does not change a sum or product.
additive identity — the number 0, which leaves any number unchanged when added.
multiplicative identity — the number 1, which leaves any number unchanged when multiplied.
additive inverse — what adds to a number to give 0; its opposite.
multiplicative inverse — what multiplies a number to give 1; its reciprocal.
distributive property — multiplying a sum equals multiplying each term and adding.
common factor — a factor shared by every term, which can be pulled out front.
undefined — describes an expression that names no number at all.
The headline result
These properties are the list of legal moves
Solving an equation means producing a chain of equivalent equations, each a small rewriting of the last, ending with the variable alone. Every link has to be legal — and this section is the list.
Up to now the properties simplified expressions. Chapter 3 puts them to a second use, and asks you to name them: distributive property, commutative property, additive inverse, multiplicative identity.
† The question "why am I allowed to do that?" now has an answer you can point to — which is the difference between following a procedure and doing algebra.
§0.5 — Conclusions
Order and grouping are free for addition and multiplication and not for subtraction and division. The distributive property bridges the two operations, and read backwards it explains why like terms combine at all. Zero and one are the numbers that do nothing — which is what makes them useful.
Swapping the operands of a subtraction, leaving a minus sign behind when distributing, forgetting the invisible −1 in front of a parenthesis, combining before distributing, dropping the 1 when factoring 8h+8, and reading "undefined" as zero.
Next: Chapter 1 — where these properties stop being facts to state and become steps to cite. Back to start.