Integrated Math 1 · Chapter 1 · Functions
One dot pattern adds four dots every minute. Its twin doubles. Picture, table, graph, and rule are four ways of saying either one, and each makes a different question easy.
bookSHelf · Integrated Math 1 · §1.2 · a self-paced section
Outline — by the end of this section you will be able to
§1.2.1 — Four ways to show the same pattern
| Representation | What it looks like | What it is good at |
|---|---|---|
| Picture / diagram | a sequence of figures, one per step | showing why the rule works — you can point at the new pieces |
| Table | inputs in one column, outputs in the next | spotting how the output changes from one step to the next |
| Graph | points or a curve on a coordinate plane | showing the overall shape of the growth at a glance |
| Rule (equation) | symbols such as B=8N+16 | jumping to a far-away step without listing everything before it |
Table 1.2.1: Each representation is a full description of the pattern; they differ only in what they make easy.
Not every pattern is friendly enough to have all four. A price list taped to a shop window is a table and nothing else — and that is where this section starts.
§1.2.1 — Worked example
Example 1.2.1 — an N×N centre inside a border two tiles thick; simplify all four cuts
| Student | How they cut it | Expression |
|---|---|---|
| Marisol | floor minus centre hole | (N+4)2−N2 |
| Jamal | four pinwheel strips | 4⋅2(N+2) |
| Priya | four sides + four corners | 4(2N)+4(4) |
| Wen | two across, two up | 2⋅2(N+4)+2⋅2N |
Table 1.2.2: Four students, four ways of seeing one border.
Multiply each one out:
(N+4)2−N2=N2+8N+16−N2=8N+16 4⋅2(N+2)=8(N+2)=8N+16 4(2N)+4(4)=8N+16 2⋅2(N+4)+2⋅2N=4N+16+4N=8N+16Answer: all four give 8N+16. They were four correct descriptions of one border the whole time.
§1.2.1 — From one floor to several
One floor cannot show growth — several, side by side, can
| Centre size, N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Border tiles, B | 24 | 32 | 40 | 48 | 56 | 64 |
Table 1.2.3: The N=5 column is §1.1's floor, and it says 56 — what all four students counted.
Each entry is 8 more than the one before it. Every time the centre grows by one tile on a side, the border needs exactly 8 more — and the rule says so out loud, because the 8 in 8N+16 is the number multiplying N.
Four expressions became one by simplifying. One expression became a visible pattern here by tabulating. Each representation makes a different fact obvious, and none makes every fact obvious.
Insight — one sentence, four languages
A picture, a table, a graph, and a rule are four translations of the same sentence. A translation can be clumsy in one language and graceful in another, but it never changes the meaning.
If two of your four disagree, one of the translations is wrong — and now you know to go find it.
§1.2.1 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.1 — (a) find B when N=7, twice: by continuing the table, and from the rule; (b) a border took 104 tiles — how big was the centre square?
(a) From the table. It ends at N=6 with 64, and each step adds 8. From the rule.
64+8=72B=8(7)+16=56+16=72(b) Working backwards. We want 8N+16=104.
8N=104−16=88N=888=11Answer: (a) 72 tiles, two representations agreeing. (b) The centre square was 11 by 11.
§1.2.2 — A pattern that grows by adding
| Minutes, t | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dots, D | 1 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 21 |
Table 1.2.4: Counting the dots turns the picture into a table — 13 dots at 3 minutes, no drawing required.
The same number every time. The outputs tell you where the pattern is; the gaps tell you what it is doing.
§1.2.2 — Definition
Definition 1.2.1 — Constant Difference
A pattern has a constant difference when you get from each output to the next by adding the same number. That fixed number is the difference.
Here the difference is 4, and the picture says where the 4 comes from: four arms, one new dot on each, every minute. That is the picture doing a job the table cannot do.
Definition 1.2.1: four new dots arrive every minute, and that is where the 4 comes from.
Context Pause — the gap between the numbers is the real information
The outputs tell you where the pattern is. The gaps tell you what it is doing, and doing is what a rule has to capture.
Almost every question in this section is answered by looking at the gaps — subtract them, or divide them, but always look between the numbers rather than at them.
Insight — climbing stairs versus taking the elevator
A recursive rule is the staircase. Each step is easy, and you have to take every one of them. An explicit rule is the elevator: press the floor number and arrive.
Neither rule is the better rule in general. The question decides — which is exactly the choice §1.2.4 turns into a habit.
§1.2.2 — Definition
Definition 1.2.2 — Recursive Rule
A recursive rule gives the first value of a pattern and then tells you how to build each new value from the value before it.
D(0)=1,D(t)=D(t−1)+4"Start with 1 dot. Every minute, the count is whatever it was last minute, plus 4." Some books write this as now = previous + 4.
Definition 1.2.2: one hop gets you the next step, and the hundredth costs a hundred hops.
§1.2.2 — Definition
Definition 1.2.3 — Explicit Rule
An explicit rule computes the value at any step directly from the step number, without needing the value of the step before it.
D(t)=4t+1The 4 is the number of arms, the t is how long they have been growing, and the +1 is the center dot. Checked at t=0,1,2,3 it returns 1, 5, 9, 13 — four agreements with Table 1.2.4.
Definition 1.2.3: four arms of t dots plus one center dot is exactly what 4t+1 says.
§1.2.2 — Worked example
Example 1.2.2 — use D(t)=4t+1 to find the dots at 100 minutes, and write the dots at t minutes
Step 1 — substitute the step number, then do the arithmetic.
D(100)=4(100)+1=400+1=401Step 2 — read it back into the picture. Four arms, each 100 dots long, is 400 dots, plus the one center dot that never moves.
Answer: 401 dots at 100 minutes; D(t)=4t+1 dots at t minutes — the rule is the answer for every t at once.
§1.2.2 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.2 — for Growing Dots: (a) dots at 7 minutes; (b) dots at 250 minutes; (c) which rule for each, and why
(a) The table stops at 21 dots, two recursive steps away — and the explicit rule agrees.
21+4=2525+4=29D(7)=4(7)+1=29(b) Recursion would mean 245 more additions, so use the explicit rule.
D(250)=4(250)+1=1001Answer: (a) 29; (b) 1001; (c) recursive when a known value is nearby, explicit when the step is far away.
§1.2.3 — A pattern that grows by multiplying
| Growing Dots | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dots, D | 1 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 21 |
| Differences | +4 | +4 | +4 | +4 | +4 |
Four new dots arrive each minute, whatever the figure already holds.
| Growing, Growing Dots | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dots, N | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 |
| Ratios | ×2 | ×2 | ×2 | ×2 | ×2 |
Every dot is replaced by two, so growth depends on how big the figure already is.
Table 1.2.5: Both index from t=0: constant difference 4 against constant ratio 2.
Run the difference test on the right-hand table and you get 1,2,4,8 — not constant. Failing a test is information: it tells you to go try the other one. The rules are D(t)=4t+1 and N(t)=2t.
§1.2.3 — Definition
Definition 1.2.4 — Constant Ratio
A pattern has a constant ratio when you get from each output to the next by multiplying by the same number. That fixed number is the ratio.
N(0)=1,N(t)=2⋅N(t−1),N(t)=2tExponent notation is only shorthand for repeated multiplication here — 2t is "doubled t times." The rules for working with exponents come in §1.5.
Definition 1.2.4: every dot becomes two dots, so the whole count is multiplied by 2.
§1.2.3 — Worked example
Example 1.2.3 — (a) dots at 8 minutes for Growing, Growing Dots; (b) compare with Growing Dots at 8 minutes
Compare. The doubling picture started out behind — 2 dots against 5 at one minute — and at eight minutes it is ahead by a factor of about 8.
Answer: (a) 256 dots; (b) 33 dots for Growing Dots, so the doubling pattern is now far ahead.
Insight — a rumor beats a paycheck
Give someone $4 a day and after three weeks they have $84. Have one person tell two people, who each tell two more, and after three weeks the rumor has passed a million.
That is the whole gap between the two columns of Table 1.2.5, and it does not depend on the size of the amount being added.
§1.2.3 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.3 — a pattern starts at 3 and doubles every step: 3, 6, 12, 24, … (a) write both rules; (b) find the 7th value, counting the starting 3 as the 1st
(a) The ratio is 2. The nth value has been doubled n−1 times, because the 1st has not been doubled at all.
f(1)=3,f(n)=2⋅f(n−1)f(n)=3⋅2n−1(b) Check by listing: 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 96, 192.
f(7)=3⋅26=3⋅64=192§1.2.4 — Telling the two apart from a table
The two-test procedure
1. Subtract each output from the next. All the same? It adds — record the difference.
2. If not, divide each output by the one before. All the same? It multiplies — record the ratio.
3. Neither constant? The pattern is neither — still a pattern, just not one of these two.
Run both tests on every neighboring pair. Two matching differences prove nothing: 1,3,5,11,21 starts out looking like it adds 2, and then stops.
| 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | Test | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4 | 8 | 16 | 32 | ratios all 2 | multiplying |
| 66 | 50 | 34 | 18 | 2 | differences all −16 | adding (negative) |
| 160 | 80 | 40 | 20 | 10 | ratios all 21 | multiplying (shrinking) |
| −9 | −2 | 5 | 12 | 19 | differences all +7 | adding |
Table 1.2.6: Shrinking happens both ways — a negative difference, or a ratio between 0 and 1.
Insight — naming comes later
These two kinds of growth do have names, and Chapter 4 gives them. A name is what you call the answer after the test has given it to you; it is not a shortcut to the answer.
Someone who remembers only "the fast one grows by multiplying" will say that about every fast-growing table, and will be wrong about half the time. For now, run the test and report what it found.
§1.2.4 — Worked example
Example 1.2.4 — x=0,1,2,3,4 pairs with y=5,8,11,14,?; describe the next term, write both rules, and classify
Step 1 — difference test. Constant at 3, so it grows by adding, and the missing value is 14+3=17.
8−5=311−8=314−11=3Steps 2–5 — both rules. Here x starts at 0, so by step n you have taken n steps.
f(0)=5,f(n)=f(n−1)+3f(n)=5+3nAnswer: add 3; f(n)=5+3n; grows by adding. Check at n=3: 5+9=14.
§1.2.4 — Worked example · Table A
Example 1.2.5 — x=1,2,3,4 pairs with y=5,10,20,40; next term, both rules, classification
Step 1 — differences are 5,10,20. Not constant, so it does not grow by adding. Ratio test:
510=21020=22040=2Step 2 — the rules. Start at 5 and double n−1 times; the 5th term is 40×2=80.
f(1)=5,f(n)=2⋅f(n−1)f(n)=5⋅2n−1Answer: multiply by 2, next term 80; grows by multiplying, constant ratio 2. Check at n=4: 5⋅8=40.
§1.2.4 — Worked example · Table B
Example 1.2.5 — x=1 through 6 pairs with y=−8,−17,−26,−35,−44,−53; next term, both rules, classification
Step 1 — difference test. Constant at −9, so it grows by adding. Falling is exactly what a negative difference looks like.
−17−(−8)=−9−26−(−17)=−9−35−(−26)=−9Step 2 — the rules, then distribute.
f(1)=−8,f(n)=f(n−1)−9f(n)=−8−9(n−1)=−9n+1Answer: subtract 9; f(n)=−9n+1; grows by adding. Check at n=4: −36+1=−35.
§1.2.4 — Worked example · Table E
Example 1.2.6 — x=0 through 5 pairs with y=3,4,7,12,19,?; next term, an explicit rule, classification
Step 1 — both tests fail. Differences 1,3,5,7; ratios 34,47,712 nowhere near constant. The verdict is neither.
Step 2 — the differences climb by 2, so the next difference is 9 and the next term is 19+9=28. The outputs sit 3 above the perfect squares:
f(n)=n2+3Answer: next term 28; f(n)=n2+3; neither kind.
Calling a table the multiplying kind because it grows quickly is a guess, not a verdict.
§1.2.4 — Worked example · Table F
Example 1.2.7 — x=1 through 6 pairs with y=−1,0.2,−0.04,0.008,−0.0016,0.00032
Step 1 — the values flip sign, which looks alarming. The test does not care.
−10.2=−0.20.2−0.04=−0.2−0.040.008=−0.2Step 2 — the rules.
f(1)=−1,f(n)=−0.2⋅f(n−1)f(n)=−1⋅(−0.2)n−1Answer: grows by multiplying, constant ratio −0.2. The negative sign flips the values; the size below 1 shrinks them toward zero.
§1.2.4 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.4 — classify and write an explicit rule: (a) 66,50,34,18,2; (b) 160,80,40,20,10; (c) which rule finds the 30th term of (a)?
(a) Differences all −16, so it grows by adding, counting the first term as n=1:
f(n)=66−16(n−1)=82−16n(b) Differences vary; ratios are all 21, so it grows by multiplying:
f(n)=160⋅(21)n−1(c) The explicit rule — 25 subtractions otherwise: f(30)=82−480=−398.
Context Pause — "different from the book" is not the same as "wrong"
This is the single most useful thing in the subsection. When your expression does not match the answer key, the first move is not to reach for the eraser.
Most of the time the two collapse to the same thing, and you have found a second way of seeing the figure rather than a mistake.
§1.2.5 — Graphs of situations
| What the graph does | What it means about the situation |
|---|---|
| rises / falls left to right | the output quantity is increasing / decreasing |
| stays flat (horizontal) | the output quantity is not changing |
| rises steeply / gently | it is increasing quickly / slowly |
| a straight segment | the change is happening at a constant rate |
| a bending curve | the rate of change is itself changing |
Table 1.2.8: Each row is a translation between something the graph does and something the situation does.
Not every relationship arrives as a picture of dots. Often it arrives as a story — and the shape of a graph carries meaning a column of numbers does not.
§1.2.5 — Worked example · the same afternoon, graphed twice
Example 1.2.8 — Marisol and Jamal are laying the 56 border tiles of the N = 5 design, and they lay 8 tiles an hour between them. Three hours in they stop for an hour, then finish the job. Graph the tiles laid so far against hours elapsed.
Setting up the timeline. At 8 tiles an hour, three hours of work lays 24 tiles. The break adds none. The remaining 32 tiles take 4 more hours, finishing at hour 8.
| Hours | What is happening | Tiles laid | Shape of the graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 3 | laying at a steady 8 an hour | 0 up to 24 | a straight segment rising |
| 3 to 4 | the break | stays at 24 | a horizontal segment |
| 4 to 8 | back to a steady 8 an hour | 24 up to 56 | rising again, same steepness |
Answer: climbs to 24, flat through the break, then climbs to 56 by hour 8.
§1.2.5 — Worked example · the same afternoon, graphed twice
Example 1.2.8, continued — same afternoon, same workers, same break. Now graph the tiles still to lay against hours elapsed.
| Hours | Tiles remaining | Shape of the graph |
|---|---|---|
| 0 to 3 | 56 down to 32 | a straight segment falling |
| 3 to 4 | stays at 32 | a horizontal segment |
| 4 to 8 | 32 down to 0 | a straight segment falling |
The point. One graph climbs from 0 to 56; the other drops from 56 to 0. Nothing about the afternoon changed — what changed is which quantity went on the vertical axis.
Both graphs have a flat piece from hour 3 to hour 4, and both are made of straight pieces because the work happened at a constant rate.
§1.2.5 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.5 — Priya fills a bucket for 2 minutes, carries it for 1, then pours it out over 30 seconds. (a) Sketch the water in the bucket against time and say what each piece means. (b) One piece is flat — why is that right when Priya is working hardest during it?
(a) Three pieces.
| Time | What is happening | Water in the bucket | Shape |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 to 2 min | filling from the tap | rising from empty to full | a straight segment rising |
| 2 to 3 min | carrying it | stays full | a horizontal segment |
| 3 to 3.5 min | pouring it out | full to empty | a steep segment falling |
(b) Why flat is right. The graph tracks water in the bucket, and carrying it changes where the water is, not how much.
Answer: rising, flat, then falling steeply — steep on the way out because the same water leaves in a quarter of the time; flat because the graphed quantity is unchanged.
§1.2.6 — Moving between the representations
| From | To | How |
|---|---|---|
| Picture | Table | count the objects in each figure |
| Table | Rule | test differences, then ratios |
| Rule | Table | substitute step numbers and evaluate |
| Table | Graph | plot each (input, output) pair |
| From | To | How |
|---|---|---|
| Graph | Table | read coordinates off labeled points |
| Story | Graph | increasing / unchanged → rising / flat |
| Graph | Story | describe each piece in the situation's language |
| Picture | Rule | name what each visible part contributes |
Table 1.2.9: Eight roads, not eight procedures.
Check across representations, not within one. A mistake almost never shows up where it was made — it shows up when a second representation disagrees. And say what each symbol means: in D(t)=4t+1 the 4 is dots-per-minute and the 1 is the starting dot.
Insight — a map, not a checklist
Think of the four representations as four cities and Table 1.2.9 as the roads. You are not memorizing eight procedures.
You are learning that from wherever you are standing, there is a road to wherever the question is easy.
§1.2.6 — Your turn
Try It Now 1.2.6 — a rule is given as y=5x−1: (a) build a table for x=0 through 4; (b) describe the graph of those points without drawing it; (c) classify the pattern, and say which of the four representations you used to decide
| x | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| y | −1 | 4 | 9 | 14 | 19 |
(b) The differences are 5,5,5,5, so the points climb 5 units for every 1 unit across — a straight line, meeting the vertical axis at (0,−1), which is what the rule gives at x=0.
(c) Constant difference of 5, so it grows by adding. The table decided it: the rule alone would only tell you if you already knew that y=mx+b always grows by adding, but the differences are the direct evidence.
§1.2 — Key terminology (1 of 2)
| constant difference | the fixed number added to each output to get the next one |
| constant ratio | the fixed number each output is multiplied by to get the next one |
| recursive rule | a rule giving the first value and how to build each new value from the previous one |
| explicit rule | a rule computing the value at any step directly from the step number |
§1.2 — Key terminology (2 of 2)
| horizontal intercept | a point where a graph meets the horizontal axis, so the output is 0 |
| vertical intercept | a point where a graph meets the vertical axis, so the input is 0 |
| maximum | the highest point of a graph; the largest output it reaches |
Seven words, and every one of them names something you can point at in a table, a picture, or a graph.
§1.2 — Key result
Multiplying repeatedly always overwhelms adding repeatedly
However large the amount being added, and however small the ratio above 1, the multiplying pattern eventually passes the adding pattern and never gives the lead back.†
| Minutes | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growing Dots, 4t+1 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 21 | 41 | 81 |
| Growing, Growing Dots, 2t | 1 | 2 | 16 | 32 | 1,024 | 1,048,576 |
Table 1.2.10: The adding pattern leads for the first four minutes and never recovers.
† Both patterns are perfectly regular and neither ever skips or stalls — the gap is not a quirk of these particular numbers.
§1.2 — Conclusions
Subtract, then divide. A constant difference means the pattern adds; a constant ratio means it multiplies; neither means neither. Write both rules, use the recursive one for a nearby step and the explicit one for a far-away step, and check every answer in a second representation.
Testing only the first pair; calling a fast-growing table the multiplying kind without running the ratio test; losing a doubling in the n−1 exponent; and drawing a busy graph for a flat quantity because the situation was busy.
Next: this section said "the number of dots at t minutes" as if that always named one definite number. For the bagel sign it did not — 13 bagels produced four prices. §1.3 makes that honest, and calls the well-behaved case a function. Back to start.