2% and 85%
Two rates. Two different groups of women.
B = develops cancer N = tests negative
Part a — the unconditional rates
one in seven
=
1 ÷ 7
=
0.143
P(B) = 0.143
85%
=
85 ÷ 100
=
0.85
P(N) = 0.85
Part b — the 2% is not what it looks like
“Of those women who develop breast cancer…”
all 1,000 → only the 143 with B
2%
=
2 ÷ 100
=
0.02
P(N | B) = 0.02
P(N) = 0.85 vs P(N | B) = 0.02
The bar is not decoration. It changes who you are talking about.
Part c — both things happen
P(B AND N) = P(B) · P(N | B)
all women → 14.3% → 2% of those
(0.143)(0.02) = 0.0029
≈ 3 women in 1,000 — count them.
Part d — one thing or the other
P(B OR N) = P(B) + P(N) − P(B AND N)
0.143 + 0.85 − 0.0029 = 0.9901
Part e — are B and N independent?
P(N | B) ≠ P(N) → not independent
A test whose result didn’t depend on the disease would be useless.
The dependence is the diagnostic power.
Part f — can both happen at once?
P(B AND N) = 0.0029 ≠ 0 → not mutually exclusive
That is a false negative — and we just measured how often it happens.
All six answers
0.143 · 0.85 · 0.02 · 0.0029 · 0.9901 · no · no
Six words changed which group is under discussion.
When one of these seems intractable, look for that clause first.